Battery Module Line Layout for Multi-Model Production Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-line type battery device manufacturing systems face challenges with reduced space utilization, increased worker movements, and low production efficiency, particularly when manufacturing multiple models or dealing with failures in manufacturing devices.

Innovation Solution

A battery device manufacturing system with multiple manufacturing lines arranged in a decoupled manner, including first lines for battery cell and cell assembly, second lines for sub-battery module assembly, and third lines for battery module assembly, utilizing transfer devices like overhead conveyor belts or autonomous vehicles to optimize space and production efficiency, allowing for simultaneous production of various models and continued operation despite device failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If an in-line type battery device manufacturing system is used, then the manufacturing process flows in one direction from input of basic components to discharge of final battery modules, but space utilization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process flowVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing system is divided into multiple independent manufacturing lines (first, second, and third lines) that can operate simultaneously. Each line handles specific manufacturing stages, allowing parallel processing of different battery device models. This segmentation enables multiple models to be manufactured concurrently without interfering with each other, thereby improving space utilization while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If an in-line type battery device manufacturing system is used, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but worker movements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidworker movement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the manufacturing system into separate lines for different models, workers are assigned to specific lines and can focus on repetitive tasks without needing to move between different workstations. This reduces unnecessary worker movements while maintaining process simplicity within each dedicated line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If an in-line type battery device manufacturing system is used, then the system structure is simplified, but simultaneous production of various models is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidmulti-model production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into multiple independent manufacturing lines, where each line is dedicated to producing a specific battery device model. This allows simultaneous production of various models without requiring complex reconfiguration of a single in-line system. Each line maintains relative simplicity while the overall system achieves high versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If an in-line type battery device manufacturing system is used, then the system is easier to control, but production efficiency decreases when failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidproduction efficiency under failure conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the manufacturing system into independent lines, a failure in one line does not affect the operation of other lines. Each line can continue producing its designated model, maintaining overall production efficiency. The independent structure allows for localized problem resolution without requiring complete system shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Productivity

If multiple second manufacturing lines are used to manufacture sub-battery modules, then production capacity increases, but space utilization is reduced in in-line configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-battery module production capacityVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of arranging multiple second manufacturing lines in a single in-line sequence, the patent distributes them across different spatial locations and allows them to operate in parallel. The decoupled configuration enables multiple lines to coexist without requiring excessive linear space, improving space utilization while maintaining high production capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240421338A1Battery device manufacturing system
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 SK ON CO LTD
  • US20240421338A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421338A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421338A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery device manufacturing system is disclosed. In some embodiments, the battery device manufacturing system includes a plurality of first manufacturing lines configured to manufacture a plurality of battery cells and a cell assembly in which the plurality of battery cells are stacked, a plurality of second manufacturing lines configured to couple a busbar assembly to the cell assembly to manufacture a sub-battery module, and a plurality of third manufacturing lines configured to couple the sub-battery module to a case to manufacture a battery module, wherein one of the plurality of third manufacturing lines is configured to receive the sub-battery module from each of two second manufacturing lines among the plurality of second manufacturing lines.