Battery Management System Multi-Error Diagnosis Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery management systems (BMS) are unable to effectively handle multi-errors in battery systems, as they apply the same error reactions for both single and multi-errors, leading to inefficient error confirmation and reduced battery usage, which affects fuel consumption.

Innovation Solution

The system includes a battery management system that applies different diagnostic error code confirm conditions for voltage and current sensors when a multi-error is detected, maintaining the main relay in an on state and requesting fail-safe cooperative control from the vehicle controller to adjust charging and discharging torque based on capacitor voltage, thereby distinguishing between single and multi-errors and optimizing battery usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the same error reaction is applied to both single-error and multi-error cases, then the system is simple to operate, but the error confirmation becomes inefficient and battery usage is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror confirmation efficiencyVSAvoiderror diagnosis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The error diagnosis function is segmented into two distinct pathways: one for single-error cases and another for multi-error cases. The BMS determines the error type and applies different confirm conditions accordingly, allowing efficient error confirmation without requiring complex unified logic for all error scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The error confirm conditions are made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts the confirm conditions based on the detected error type (single-error vs. multi-error), enabling the diagnosis system to adapt its behavior to the specific error situation, thereby improving confirmation efficiency without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the main relay is turned off upon detecting any error, then system safety is improved, but battery usage is unnecessarily reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidbattery usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different safety responses are applied based on the local characteristics of the error type. For single-error cases, the main relay is turned off to ensure safety. For multi-error cases where fail-safe cooperative control is requested, the system maintains battery usage by adjusting torque instead of immediately disconnecting the relay, optimizing productivity while maintaining adequate safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameters based on error type. Instead of a fixed response (always turning off the relay), the system varies the response parameter (relay state vs. torque adjustment) according to the specific error situation, allowing both safety and productivity to be optimized for different scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If different diagnostic error code confirm conditions are applied for voltage and current sensors in multi-error cases, then error confirmation efficiency is improved, but the diagnostic system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror diagnosis accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system is segmented to apply different confirm conditions to voltage sensors and current sensors based on their specific error characteristics. This segmentation allows each sensor type to be diagnosed with appropriate conditions, improving accuracy without requiring a completely new complex diagnostic framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The BMS maintains a universal error diagnosis framework that can handle both single-error and multi-error cases. By extending this existing framework with multi-functionality to accommodate different confirm conditions for different sensor types, the system achieves improved diagnostic accuracy without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10183664B2Vehicle system, battery system and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10183664B2 patent drawing
  • US10183664B2 patent drawing
  • US10183664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery system is provided. The system includes a battery and a sensor unit having a voltage sensor that detects a voltage of the battery and a current sensor that detects a charging and discharging current of the battery. A power relay assembly of the system includes a main relay that connects between the battery and a vehicle system. Additionally, a battery management system (BMS) applies different diagnostic error code confirm conditions to the voltage sensor and the current sensor when a multi-error of the voltage sensor and the current sensor is detected.