Battery Module Assembly for Cooling and Shock Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional energy storage systems face challenges in maintaining stable disposition and connection of battery cells, accommodating size variations, and effective cooling, particularly due to restrictive bus bar designs and inadequate shock absorption, which can lead to damage during installation, movement, or external shocks.

Innovation Solution

The energy storage system incorporates a configuration with facing battery modules connected by module screws, upper and lower fixing brackets, and insulating plates, along with side covers and brackets for enhanced stability, cooling, and shock absorption, allowing for flexible module arrangement and efficient heat dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional bus bars with same shape are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability for size changes is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebus bar manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbattery pack size adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bus bar is divided into multiple segments (first bus bar and second bus bar) that can be independently positioned and connected. This segmentation allows the bus bar structure to adapt to different battery pack sizes while maintaining standardized manufacturing processes for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bus bar structure is made adjustable through positioning holes and fastening mechanisms, allowing dynamic reconfiguration of the bus bar arrangement to match different battery cell configurations and pack sizes, rather than being fixed in a single rigid design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Temperature

If cooling water circulation structure is added, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cell cooling effectivenessVSAvoidcooling system structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling function is merged with the existing battery pack structure by utilizing the casing and internal space for cooling water circulation, rather than adding completely separate cooling components. The cooling water channel is integrated into the casing structure, combining structural support and thermal management functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling water circulation system is designed to work with the existing battery pack structure, where the casing serves multiple functions: structural enclosure, shock absorption, and cooling water channel. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If rectangular parallelepiped casing structure is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but shock absorption capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing structure manufacturingVSAvoidexternal shock transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The casing incorporates shock-absorbing structures and cushioning elements positioned in advance to mitigate external shocks before they reach the battery cells. These cushioning features are integrated into the casing design to protect against drops and external impacts while maintaining the overall rectangular form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Device complexity

If only lower side fixing structure is provided, then device complexity is reduced, but disposition stability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixing structure complexityVSAvoidbattery cell disposition stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Fixing structures are added at specific critical locations (upper side and side surfaces) where stability is most needed, rather than uniformly throughout the entire structure. This targeted approach provides necessary stabilization while minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12160014B2Energy storage system
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US12160014B2 patent drawing
  • US12160014B2 patent drawing
  • US12160014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy storage system of the present disclosure includes: a first battery module in which a plurality of battery cells are disposed; a second battery module in which a plurality of battery cells are disposed, and which is disposed to face the first battery module; a module screw which extends in a front-rear direction in which the first battery module and the second battery module are disposed, and fastens the first battery module and the second battery module; an upper fixing bracket which is disposed in an upper side of the first battery module and the second battery module, and fixes the first battery module and the second battery module; and a lower fixing bracket which is disposed in a lower side of the first battery module and the second battery module, and fixes the first battery module and the second battery module.