Battery Module Deterioration Diagnosis and Selective Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for diagnosing secondary battery deterioration do not efficiently enable module-by-module replacement in battery packs, which are composed of multiple modules, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies in battery maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that include a deterioration diagnosis unit to calculate a deterioration indicator for each battery module, a detection unit to identify modules requiring replacement, and an extraction unit to identify additional modules to replace based on remaining life estimates, allowing for targeted and cost-effective replacement of battery modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If battery replacement is carried out module by module, then replacement cost is reduced, but it becomes difficult to determine which modules should be replaced simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement costVSAvoiddeterioration determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the battery pack into multiple battery modules and performs individual deterioration diagnosis on each module. By calculating deterioration indicators for each module separately and comparing them against replacement criteria, the system enables selective replacement of only those modules that meet the replacement conditions, rather than replacing the entire battery pack or using fixed replacement intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses deterioration indicators (such as capacity ratios, internal resistance changes, or voltage characteristics) as parameters to objectively determine module replacement needs. By monitoring these parameters and comparing them against predetermined thresholds, the system transforms the subjective decision of when to replace modules into an objective parameter-based determination, enabling cost-effective selective replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If all battery modules are replaced at fixed intervals, then reliability is maintained, but replacement cost increases due to replacing still-functional modules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery system reliabilityVSAvoidreplacement cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary deterioration diagnosis on each battery module to identify which modules actually require replacement before the replacement process begins. By assessing the current state of each module against replacement criteria, the system determines in advance which modules should be replaced, avoiding the waste of replacing modules that are still functional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables each battery module to essentially 'self-diagnose' its own replacement need through the deterioration indicator calculation and comparison process. Modules that exceed replacement thresholds are automatically identified for replacement, while modules below thresholds continue operating, allowing the battery system to maintain reliability without unnecessary replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If individual battery modules are diagnosed for deterioration, then replacement precision is improved, but diagnosis time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeterioration diagnosis precisionVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the battery pack into multiple modules and performs deterioration diagnosis on each segment independently. This segmentation allows the use of standardized diagnostic procedures for each module, improving precision by focusing on individual module characteristics while enabling parallel processing to reduce overall diagnosis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs specific deterioration indicators (such as capacity retention ratios, internal resistance changes, or voltage deviation metrics) that can be calculated from routine battery operation data. By using these parameters that can be derived from existing measurements rather than requiring additional complex testing, the system achieves high diagnostic precision without proportionally increasing diagnosis time or computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9435866B2Device and method for determining deterioration of secondary battery
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9435866B2 patent drawing
  • US9435866B2 patent drawing
  • US9435866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary battery is implemented as an assembly of a plurality of battery modules. An ECU calculates a deterioration indicator quantitatively indicating a degree of deterioration of a battery module for each of the plurality of battery modules, and detects as a module to be replaced, a battery module of which deterioration indicator has reached a prescribed replacement level. The ECU further extracts a module to additionally be replaced, which should be replaced simultaneously with the module to be replaced above, from battery modules of which deterioration indicator has not reached the replacement level, among the plurality of battery modules.