Vehicle Battery Mounting Structure with Closed-Section Side Members

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing purpose-built vehicles (PBVs) with high-voltage batteries face challenges in securely mounting batteries, which compromises safety during lateral collisions and NVH performance due to their flat-floor design.

Innovation Solution

A battery mounting structure that includes a battery case with reinforcing members and side members of closed cross-sections, coupled to the vehicle frame via through-fasteners, and a middle through-fastener extending through a reinforcing member to a vehicle body cross member, enhancing stability and rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a flat-floor design is used in PBV, then ease of manufacture and adaptability are improved, but floor strength and NVH performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidfloor strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The floor structure is segmented into multiple components: the flat floor panel, battery case with reinforcing members, side members with closed cross-sections, and through-fasteners. This segmentation allows the flat-floor design to maintain adaptability while the distributed reinforcing elements collectively enhance floor strength to compensate for the inherent weakness of flat-floor design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting structure employs composite construction combining the floor panel, battery case, reinforcing members, and fastening system. This composite structure creates a unified load-bearing assembly where the flat floor works in conjunction with the reinforced battery mounting system to achieve both adaptability and sufficient strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If simple battery mounting is used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but safety against lateral collision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The battery mounting system is divided into modular components: battery case, reinforcing members, side members, and through-fasteners. This segmentation enables standardized manufacturing of individual parts while the assembled structure provides enhanced safety against lateral collisions through the distributed reinforcement architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The side members are designed with closed cross-sections (circular or oval profiles) that provide superior torsional rigidity and collision resistance compared to open-section alternatives. This curved, closed-profile design maintains ease of manufacture through standard extrusion processes while dramatically improving safety performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Strength

If reinforcing members are added to battery case, then safety and floor strength are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing members are merged with the battery case structure, forming an integrated assembly where the battery case serves dual purposes: containing battery modules and providing structural reinforcement. This merging reduces device complexity by eliminating separate reinforcement components while maintaining improved floor strength and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The battery case is designed with multi-functionality: it provides battery module containment, structural reinforcement through integrated members, and serves as a mounting interface for the floor system. This universal design reduces overall device complexity by consolidating multiple functions into a single integrated component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If through-fasteners are used to couple battery case to vehicle body, then reliability and floor strength are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening system is segmented into multiple through-fasteners distributed at critical locations rather than using a single complex fastening mechanism. This segmentation provides reliable load distribution and collision resistance while maintaining relative simplicity through the use of standard fastener components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The side members with closed cross-sections provide a robust interface for the through-fasteners, with the curved profiles distributing fastener loads more effectively. This geometric feature enhances reliability of the connection while the fasteners themselves remain relatively simple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS20230223635A1Vehicle battery mounting structure
Publication Date: 2023.07.13 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230223635A1 patent drawing
  • US20230223635A1 patent drawing
  • US20230223635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle battery mounting structure includes a battery case, which has a reinforcing member disposed between battery modules therein. The mounting structure includes battery side members, which have a plurality of closed cross-sections, are provided on opposite sides of the battery case, respectively, and are coupled to lower sides of frame side members. The mounting structure further includes a middle through-fastener, which extends through the reinforcing member of the battery case and is coupled to a vehicle body cross member.