Battery Optimization Device for Lead-Acid Sulfation Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing battery optimization technologies lack real-time measurement and control capabilities for battery metrics such as impedance, electrolyte temperature, specific gravity, and voltage, leading to inefficient de-sulfation processes and reduced battery lifespan due to sulfation-induced resistance and increased charging cycles.
Innovation Solution
A battery optimization control device that uses real-time data collection and processing to control de-sulfation processes, applying electrical pulses and chemical additives to minimize internal impedance, reduce sulfation, and optimize charging profiles, incorporating a High Frequency-Power Factor Corrected-Switching Isolation Transformer (HFISO) for efficient energy use.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If conventional battery charging is used without real-time optimization, then the battery operates with higher internal resistance due to sulfation, but the charging system is simpler and does not require complex real-time measurement and control devices
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements real-time feedback control by continuously measuring battery metrics (impedance, temperature, specific gravity, voltage) and using this data to dynamically adjust de-sulfation processes and charging profiles, thereby resolving the contradiction between improved battery reliability and device complexity through intelligent control
Solution Approach 2:
The battery optimization device performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically monitoring its own operational parameters and modifying de-sulfation and charging processes based on real-time battery condition assessment, reducing the need for external intervention while maintaining high reliability
2Duration of action of stationary object
If real-time battery metric measurement and control is implemented, then de-sulfation processes are optimized and battery lifespan is prolonged, but the device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The optimization device integrates multiple functions (impedance measurement, temperature monitoring, specific gravity detection, voltage measurement, de-sulfation control, and charging profile optimization) into a single multi-functional system, extending battery lifespan while managing device complexity through functional integration
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces manual mechanical battery maintenance processes with automated electronic measurement and control systems that use electrical signals and digital processing to monitor and optimize battery conditions, prolonging battery lifespan through non-mechanical means
3Quantity of substance
If periodic equalization charging is performed to combat sulfation, then battery capacity is maintained, but electrical energy is wasted and charging cycles increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary de-sulfation actions during regular charging cycles by applying optimized pulse currents that prevent sulfate crystal formation before they significantly degrade capacity, maintaining battery capacity without requiring separate periodic equalization charges and thus reducing energy waste
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements periodic de-sulfation pulses with specific frequency and duration patterns that effectively combat sulfation buildup while consuming less energy than traditional continuous equalization charging, maintaining battery capacity through efficient periodic intervention
4Reliability
If high current pulses are applied for de-sulfation, then internal resistance is reduced effectively, but the risk of battery damage and thermal runaway increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs dynamic current pulse adjustment where the amplitude, duration, and frequency of de-sulfation pulses are continuously modified based on real-time battery condition monitoring, achieving effective internal resistance reduction while adapting pulse parameters to prevent battery damage and thermal runaway
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes multiple operational parameters (current amplitude, pulse width, frequency, duty cycle) in a coordinated manner to optimize de-sulfation effectiveness while maintaining safety margins, reducing internal resistance effectively while minimizing the risk of harmful effects through multi-parameter control
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The solution effectively reduces sulfation-induced resistance, prolongs battery life, minimizes the need for frequent desulfation services, and optimizes electrical usage by maintaining lower internal resistance and reducing the number of charging cycles required for the same workload.
Implementation Method 1
a control means using a native, or internal, Industrial Battery Optimization (IBO) de-sulfating device including a single or plurality of capacitive discharge channels selectively activatable by a control board to provide a pulse wave modulated de-sulfating current to a lead-acid battery
Implementation Method 2
incorporating a High Frequency-Power Factor Corrected-Switching Isolation Transformer (HFISO) for efficient energy use
Data Source
AI summary
Improvements in a battery de-sulfating device are disclosed. The improvements including a plurality of capacitive discharge channels selectively activatable by a control board to provide a pulse wave modulated de-sulfating current to a lead-acid battery. The de-sulfating current can be a variable, or harmonic, repeating pattern of about 0.1-1.5 ms ON pulse followed by an about 2-9 ms OFF period which may be applied to the battery at an operator-adjustable peak amperage of about 0-350 amps. The de-sulfation process before, during or after the normal battery charging cycle, or any combination thereof. The temperature of the battery and the specific gravity of the fluid within the battery is measure during the de-sulfating process. The extent of sulfation of the battery may be ascertained by measuring the impedance of the battery.