Battery Pack Binding Load Control for Gas Release Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing battery pack manufacturing methods face instability due to excessive binding load causing plastic deformation and increased spring constant, leading to decreased binding force during temperature changes or charging/discharging, which affects the accommodation state of battery cells and the pack as a whole.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing a battery pack that involves setting a specific binding load by calculating the ratio of positive and negative electrode active material masses to pore volumes and separator pores, ensuring the pressure applied is sufficient to release gas without overcompressing the electrode body, thus maintaining a stable binding state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If a large binding load is applied to release gas from the electrode body, then gas release is improved, but the case and electrode body undergo plastic deformation and the spring constant increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas accumulation in electrode bodyVSAvoidspring constant of battery cell
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a specific binding load parameter range (0.2 to 0.5 MPa) to optimize the balance between gas release and preventing plastic deformation. By controlling the pressure parameter within this range, the method achieves effective gas evacuation while maintaining the elastic properties of the case and electrode body, thus resolving the contradiction between gas release and spring constant maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the spring constant of the battery cell is high, then structural stability is improved, but the binding load decreases greatly during contraction due to temperature changes or charging/discharging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stability of battery cellVSAvoidbinding load
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic binding load application method where the binding load is applied progressively during the charging process rather than being fixed. This allows the binding force to adapt to the changing volume and pressure conditions of the electrode body, maintaining effective contact and binding force throughout charging/discharging cycles and temperature variations, thus resolving the contradiction between structural stability and binding force maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-generated harmful factors

If excessive pressure is applied to the electrode body, then gas release is improved, but internal resistance increases due to plastic deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas accumulationVSAvoidinternal resistance of electrode body
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the binding load parameter to a specific range (0.2 to 0.5 MPa) that is sufficient to compress gas bubbles out of the electrode body pores without causing plastic deformation of the case or electrode structure. This precise parameter control achieves effective gas removal while preserving the electrical conductivity and low internal resistance of the electrode body, resolving the contradiction between gas release and internal resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures appropriate gas release and prevents excessive pressure, maintaining a stable binding state and reducing internal resistance, while limiting the increase in spring constant and internal resistance of the battery cell.

Implementation Method 1

the binding bands apply a fixed binding load to the battery cells and the spacers in the direction in which the battery cells are arranged next to one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compression and expulsion: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the case and the electrode body may plastically deform and increase the spring constant of the battery cell

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

if the battery cell undergoes contraction due to temperature changes or charging/discharging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic contraction: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20240047730A1Method for manufacturing battery pack
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20240047730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240047730A1 patent drawing
  • US20240047730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a battery pack includes forming a positive electrode plate; forming a negative electrode plate; forming an electrode body; forming a battery cell; applying a binding load to battery cells; and initially charging the battery cells. When “A mg/cm2” represents a mass of a positive electrode active material on the positive electrode substrate, “C cm3/cm2” represents a volume of pores in the positive electrode substrate, “B mg/cm2” represents a mass of a negative electrode active material on the negative electrode substrate, “D cm3/cm2” represents a volume of pores in the negative electrode substrate, “E cm3/cm2” represents a volume of pores in the separator, and “F N/mm2” represents pressure applied to an opposing portion of a case of the electrode body facing a flat surface of the electrode body, a value of (A+B)/{(C+D+E)/F} is between 1300 and 3000, inclusive.