Battery Pack Impedance Spectroscopy During Live Cell Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery management systems (BMS) are unable to perform in-situ impedance spectroscopy of battery cells in multi-cell battery packs, leading to limited performance, power losses, and inability to identify unsafe cells or degradation modes, while also requiring disruptive offline testing for SOC balancing.

Innovation Solution

A novel architecture for battery packs with multiple nodes and node controllers allows for in-situ impedance spectroscopy by applying signals to cells while the pack operates, using power compensation by other cells to maintain voltage and power output, enabling real-time impedance feedback and cell-specific operating adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional BMS performs offline impedance testing for cell analysis, then cell impedance can be determined, but the pack operation is interrupted and requires disruptive testing procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell impedance measurementVSAvoidpack operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs impedance measurements in-situ during normal pack operation without requiring the pack to be taken offline. The measurement process is integrated into the operational workflow, allowing continuous monitoring of cell impedance while the battery pack remains in service, thus eliminating the need for disruptive offline testing procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a current source as an intermediary component that can independently apply excitation signals to individual cells or cell groups during operation. This intermediary enables measurement functions without disrupting the main power flow through the battery pack, allowing simultaneous operation and measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If conventional BMS uses cell balancing circuits with resistors to equalize SOC, then cell charge/discharge rates can be adjusted, but power losses occur and functionality is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell charge/discharge rate controlVSAvoidpower loss in balancing circuits
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameters from simple resistor-based current diversion to active control of cell voltage and current using power electronic converters. This allows precise adjustment of cell charge/discharge rates with minimal energy loss by dynamically controlling electrical parameters rather than using passive resistive elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical/passive resistor-based balancing circuit with an active electronic control system using power converters. This substitution enables more efficient current control with significantly reduced power losses compared to conventional resistive balancing methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If conventional BMS limits pack performance to accommodate impedance variations, then cell safety can be maintained, but overall pack performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell safetyVSAvoidpack power output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies individualized control strategies to each cell or cell group based on its specific impedance characteristics and state of health. Instead of uniformly limiting the entire pack's performance, the controller adjusts parameters locally for each cell, allowing high-performance cells to operate at full capacity while providing enhanced monitoring and protection for cells with degradation issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cell operating parameters in real-time based on continuously monitored impedance data. The control strategy adapts to changing cell conditions, allowing the pack to operate at optimal performance levels when cells are healthy while automatically adjusting to maintain safety when degradation is detected, rather than using static performance limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If conventional BMS requires SOC balancing to bring offline cells back online, then cell state can be equalized, but the process is complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell reactivation processVSAvoidtime required for SOC balancing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs continuous impedance monitoring and early detection of cell degradation trends during normal operation. By identifying potential issues before they require cell shutdown, the system prevents the need for complex offline balancing procedures and enables proactive maintenance scheduling that minimizes operational disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time impedance measurement feedback to continuously assess cell health status and predict remaining useful life. This feedback mechanism enables the controller to automatically adjust operating parameters to extend cell life and schedule maintenance optimally, reducing the frequency and duration of offline balancing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables uninterrupted operation of battery packs during impedance testing, providing real-time impedance feedback for cell-specific adjustments, enhancing performance and safety by identifying degradation modes and maintaining overall pack efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Cell impedance is determined based on the cell's response to the signal applied to the cell. For example, a current through the cell is charged while monitoring cells' voltage response.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance spectroscopy:

Data Source

PatentUS12352715B2Methods and systems for in-situ impedance spectroscopy analysis of battery cells in multi-cell battery packs
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 ELEMENT ENERGY INC
  • US12352715B2 patent drawing
  • US12352715B2 patent drawing
  • US12352715B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described methods and systems are used for in-situ impedance spectroscopy analysis of battery cells in multi-cell battery packs. Specifically, the cell impedances are determined while the pack continues to operate, such as being charged or discharged. For example, the pack voltage/power output remains unchanged while this analysis is initiated, performed, and ended. Cell impedance is determined based on the cell's response to the signal applied to the cell. For example, a current through the cell is charged while monitoring cells' voltage response. Although the power output of the changes during this testing, but the operation of the pack is not impacted due to the power compensation provided by one or more other cells in the pack thereby ensuring uninterrupted operation of the pack. This in situ testing is provided by the unique architecture of the pack, comprising multiple nodes and individual node controllers.