Tapered Battery Pack Reinforcement for Side-Impact Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle power source protection systems, such as those for battery packs or fuel cells, face challenges in effectively absorbing impact loads without adding significant weight or height, and often result in lateral wall tilting during side impacts.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement structure with a tapered shape, extending significantly more in length and width than in height, is designed to redistribute impact loads across a vehicle power source, featuring a two-dimensional extension with a triangular shape and ridges and valleys for attachment to the top lid and cross members, thereby minimizing intrusion during side impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional protection structures (frames, housings) are added to protect the vehicle power source, then protection capability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure transitions from conventional three-dimensional bulky frames to a two-dimensional tapered configuration. By extending primarily in the first and second directions (at least 5 times more than in the third direction), the structure achieves effective load distribution across the vehicle power source while minimizing vertical height and overall material volume, thereby reducing weight without compromising protection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure employs a tapered geometric configuration where the cross-sectional area varies along its length, creating optimized stress distribution patterns. This parameter variation in the structure's geometry allows for reduced material usage compared to uniform thick-walled frames, achieving weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity and load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional protection structures are added to protect the vehicle power source, then protection capability is improved, but the structure builds too much height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidheight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure is designed with a two-dimensional extension characteristic, where the length and width (first and second directions) are at least 5 times larger than the height (third direction). This dimensional reconfiguration distributes protection functionality across horizontal planes rather than vertical stacking, effectively reducing height addition while maintaining comprehensive protection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If conventional protection structures are used, then protection capability is improved, but lateral wall tilting occurs during side impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidlateral wall stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement structure is divided into multiple reinforcement units distributed across the vehicle power source housing. Each unit independently reinforces local areas, and their collective arrangement creates a network that distributes lateral impact forces across multiple attachment points, preventing concentrated stress that would cause lateral wall tilting while maintaining overall structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement units are strategically positioned and dimensioned to provide localized reinforcement where impact forces are most critical. The tapered configuration concentrates material where needed for load distribution while using less material in areas requiring minimal reinforcement, optimizing both anti-tilting capability and weight efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3511231B1Reinforcement structure
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 VOLVO CAR CORP
  • EP3511231B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3511231B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3511231B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a reinforcement structure (13a, 13b, 13c, 13d, 13e, 13f) for protection of a vehicle power source, e.g. a battery pack (3) or a fuel cell. The reinforcement structure extends in a first, a second and a third direction (D1, D2, D3) being perpendicular to each other, wherein an extension of the reinforcement structure is at least 5 times larger in the first and second directions than in the third direction. The reinforcement structure has a tapered shape as seen in a plane spanned by the first and second directions. The present disclosure also relates to a reinforcement unit (29a, 29b), a vehicle power source arrangement (9) and a vehicle (1).