Rechargeable Battery Packing Tray with Impact-Absorbing Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current packing mechanisms for rechargeable batteries, including cell barrier members and shock-absorbing materials, complicate the packing process, increase material costs, and require time for insertion and separation, while also being disposable and costly.

Innovation Solution

A rechargeable battery packing tray with a design featuring a bottom and inner wall forming a receiving space, including a stepped portion and reinforcement wall to support cylindrical battery cells, made from recyclable materials like ABS, PET, or pulp, which simplifies insertion and separation and reduces costs by using a double-layered structure with impact-absorbing features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cell barrier members and shock-absorbing materials are used to protect battery cells, then protection reliability is improved, but packing complexity and material cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cell protectionVSAvoidpacking structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the protection function and shock-absorption function into a single integrated tray structure. The tray includes a bottom wall and side walls that form a receiving space, with integrated reinforcement ribs and curved bottom surfaces that provide both structural support and impact protection, eliminating the need for separate barrier members and shock-absorbing materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tray structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical support for the battery cell, absorbs external impacts through its curved bottom wall and reinforcement ribs, prevents cell-to-cell contact through the receiving space design, and facilitates automated handling through its standardized geometry. This multi-functional design reduces overall packing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If disposable packing materials are used to ensure protection, then reliability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cell protectionVSAvoidpacking material cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is designed to be reusable rather than disposable. The robust structure with reinforcement ribs and integrated protection features allows the tray to be recovered and reused across multiple packing cycles, eliminating the need for continuous consumption of new packing materials and reducing overall material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If traditional packing mechanisms with multiple components are used, then protection is improved, but insertion and separation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cell protectionVSAvoidinsertion and separation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary intermediate components from the packing system. By integrating all protection and support functions into a single tray structure, the design removes multiple separate components that would require sequential assembly and disassembly operations, thereby reducing insertion and separation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If a simple tray structure is used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but protection capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidbattery cell protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tray employs local quality enhancement through strategically placed reinforcement ribs at high-stress areas, curved bottom walls for impact distribution, and thickened wall sections at connection portions. These localized structural enhancements provide maximum protection where needed while maintaining overall manufacturing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tray reduces packing costs and simplifies the handling of battery cells by providing a stable and impact-absorbing structure that is recyclable, facilitating efficient and cost-effective packing and protection of battery cells.

Implementation Method 1

The bottom can include an impact absorbing portion protruding to an outer side of the receiving space to set a first height difference ΔH1 with the bottom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10586958B2Packing tray for rechargeable battery
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD
  • US10586958B2 patent drawing
  • US10586958B2 patent drawing
  • US10586958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A packing tray for a rechargeable battery is disclosed. In one aspect, the tray includes a bottom portion and an inner wall connected to the bottom portion. The bottom portion and the inner wall define a receiving space configured to receive a battery cell. The inner wall includes upper and lower portions. The lower portion extends upwardly, and the upper portion is outwardly curved such that the upper portion is wider than the lower portion.