Battery Production Parameter Control With Bayesian Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery production methods face high rejection rates due to the complex interplay of numerous influencing factors, which are difficult to manage with traditional laboratory tests and pilot line adjustments, leading to inefficient production and increased waste.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing machine learning with Bayesian optimization to determine controllable process parameters by correlating measured production data with quality values, enabling automated adjustment of manufacturing parameters to achieve optimal battery quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional laboratory tests and pilot line adjustments are used to determine process parameters, then comprehensive quality assessment is possible, but the process is time-consuming and not feasible for all influencing factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment completenessVSAvoidparameter determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by collecting and storing production parameter data and quality data in advance during normal production operations. This pre-collected data is then used by the machine learning model to rapidly determine optimal process parameters without requiring time-consuming laboratory tests or pilot line adjustments for each parameter determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model (digital twin) of the production process using machine learning algorithms that replicates the complex relationships between production parameters and quality outcomes. This virtual model allows for rapid parameter optimization without physical experimentation, replacing time-consuming laboratory tests with computational simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive quality assessment of all influencing factors is performed, then product quality is improved, but rejection rates remain high due to the complexity of managing numerous factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cell qualityVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and identifies only the most critical production parameters that have the greatest influence on battery cell quality from the numerous possible factors. The machine learning model analyzes correlations between all production parameters and quality outcomes, then selects and focuses on the key parameters that need to be controlled, simplifying the management complexity while maintaining comprehensive quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts production parameters based on real-time data and machine learning predictions to optimize quality outcomes. By continuously adapting parameter settings rather than using fixed thresholds, the system manages the complexity of numerous influencing factors through adaptive control rather than rigid management of all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple optimization steps are performed to find optimal manufacturing parameters, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the adjustment process is slow and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter optimizationVSAvoidproduction line capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where production data and quality data are constantly collected, analyzed, and used to adjust process parameters in real-time. This closed-loop control enables rapid convergence to optimal parameters without requiring multiple sequential optimization steps, as the system learns from each production cycle and immediately applies improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs preliminary optimization calculations in advance by analyzing historical data and predicting optimal parameter combinations. This pre-computation allows the system to jump directly to near-optimal parameter settings rather than requiring multiple iterative adjustment steps during production, significantly reducing the time needed for optimization while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4388609B1Battery production plant, method for determining controllable process parameters for a battery production plant and method for operating a battery production plant
Publication Date: 2025.07.16 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4388609B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4388609B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4388609B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining controllable process parameters for a battery production system, to a method for operating a battery production system, and to a battery production system. The method for determining controllable process parameters comprises a plurality of steps. First, measurement values of production parameters in the battery production system are ascertained by means of sensors. At least one quality value of at least one battery cell produced in the battery production system on the basis of the ascertained measurement values is also ascertained, the quality value being associated with the measurement values. The at least one quality value and the measurement values are transferred to a computing unit. Subsequently, the dependency of the at least one quality value on the measurement values is ascertained in the computing unit. Then the dependency of the at least one quality value on changed production parameters which differ in value from the measurement values is ascertained in the computing unit, wherein a machine-learning method, more particularly a Bayesian optimization, is carried out in the computing unit, wherein more particularly measurement values with associated quality values are involved in the optimization as support points. Then at least one controllable process parameter is ascertained from the changed production parameters having an improved quality value, wherein ascertaining is carried out more particularly on the basis of the dependency ascertained by means of Bayesian optimization.