Battery Pruner Layout for Handle-Centered Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pruners suffer from ergonomic issues, leading to tilting moments and difficulty in handling due to improper distribution of weight and battery placement, which complicates operation and increases the risk of accidents.

Innovation Solution

A pruner design with a center of gravity positioned in the handle, offset battery pack placement, and a slim structural design, featuring a fastener for easy carrying and protective covers for batteries, enhancing ergonomics and reducing tilting moments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the battery pack is placed in the fastening section on the housing, then the pruner can be powered, but the center of gravity shifts away from the handle causing tilting moments and handling difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply capabilityVSAvoidhandling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the battery pack in the fastening section located on the rear end of the housing, utilizing the longitudinal dimension of the pruner structure. This spatial arrangement allows the battery pack to be integrated without interfering with the handle grip area, thereby maintaining handling ease while providing power supply capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the center of gravity is positioned in the handle for easy gripping, then handling is improved, but the battery pack placement becomes constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip stabilityVSAvoidbattery pack integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the pruner into distinct functional sections: the handle area for gripping and the rear fastening section for battery pack placement. This segmentation allows the center of gravity to be positioned in the handle for stable gripping while the battery pack is integrated in the separated rear section, reducing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the pruner structure is made slim for better ergonomics, then user comfort is improved, but the structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic comfortVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing a tapered reinforcement in the fastening section where the battery pack is mounted. This localized structural enhancement provides the necessary strength to support the battery pack and maintain structural integrity, while the rest of the pruner body remains slim for ergonomic comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260084336A1Wood cutter
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO KG
  • US20260084336A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084336A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pruner includes a housing and a drive motor. The drive motor drives a saw chain, which is guided in a guide groove of a guide bar, in a rotary motion via a drive chain sprocket. A fastening section for receiving a first rechargeable battery pack for supplying the drive motor with electrical energy is provided on a rear end of the housing. The fastening section is provided for receiving a second rechargeable battery pack. The fastening section is arranged on the housing, in particular at least on the first handle, in such a way that a center of gravity of the pruner lies in the first handle when the pruner is in a state in which the first rechargeable battery pack and the second rechargeable battery pack are arranged on the fastening section.