Battery Management Architecture Using Raw Sensor Data Offloading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery management systems (BMS) for Li-ion batteries are costly and inefficient due to manufacturer-specific programming, leading to increased weight and decreased efficiency, and lack broad compatibility across different platforms.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a secondary BMS architecture that collects raw data from sensors in a non-proprietary format and transmits it to a primary ECU for processing, reducing BMS complexity and enabling broader compatibility across various platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the BMS includes manufacturer-specific programming and processing algorithms, then the battery control functionality is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery control functionalityVSAvoidBMS architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides functionality into two segments: the BMS hardware collects and transmits raw sensor data, while the vehicle ECU performs all processing algorithms and control decisions. This segmentation removes complex processing requirements from the BMS, reducing its complexity while maintaining full battery control functionality through the ECU's computational capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the processing algorithms and control logic from the BMS and relocates them to the vehicle ECU. The BMS is left with only data acquisition and transmission functions, effectively taking out the computational burden and reducing BMS complexity while preserving all necessary battery management capabilities in the ECU.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the BMS includes all battery control functions with manufacturer-specific programming, then the battery management capability is improved, but the weight and cost of BMS hardware increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery management capabilityVSAvoidBMS hardware weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts computational functions from the BMS hardware and relocates them to the vehicle ECU. This extraction eliminates the need for heavy processing components in the BMS, reducing its weight while maintaining full battery management capability through the ECU's computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle ECU serves multiple functions: it manages battery processing algorithms, controls battery operations, and performs other vehicle control tasks. By making the ECU universal and multi-functional, the patent eliminates the need for dedicated heavy processing hardware in the BMS, reducing weight while maintaining comprehensive battery management capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If the BMS is configured with manufacturer-specific programming, then the battery control precision is improved, but the adaptability across different platforms decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery control precisionVSAvoidplatform compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the battery management functionality into platform-independent data collection (BMS) and platform-specific processing (ECU). The BMS collects raw data in a standardized format that can be used across different platforms, while the ECU implements manufacturer-specific algorithms, achieving both precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data representation from processed manufacturer-specific formats to raw standardized sensor data. This parameter change allows the same BMS hardware to interface with different vehicle platforms by simply changing the processing algorithms in the ECU, maintaining precision while improving adaptability across platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250210737A1Battery management system architecture
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 A123 SYSTEMS LLC
  • US20250210737A1 patent drawing
  • US20250210737A1 patent drawing
  • US20250210737A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various systems and methods are provided for a battery management system. In one example, the battery management system includes a battery data receiving unit communicatively coupled to sensors of a battery pack. Further the battery data receiving unit includes instructions stored on non-transitory memory that when executed cause the battery data receiving unit to collect raw data from the sensors of the battery pack in a first format and transmit the collected raw data to an electronic control unit for downstream processing into a second format.