Battery Retaining Device with Rotating Bolt Clamping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery holding devices fail to securely prevent batteries from tipping over, falling out, or slipping, especially for heavy batteries, and do not accommodate batteries of different sizes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A battery holding device featuring a holding frame with a clamping mechanism that includes a rotatably fastened transversely threaded bolt or spoke, allowing flexible mounting on a battery edge, with a design that includes a rear wall, bottom wall, and side walls to provide stability and accommodate various battery sizes, and optional features like window sections for electronics and fastening options for wall or floor mounting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple holding frame is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the battery cannot be securely prevented from tipping over, falling out, or slipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidbattery retention stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The holding device is divided into distinct functional segments: a holding frame for structural support, a holding bracket for battery contact, and a clamping device for securing. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping device introduces a dynamic element to the otherwise static holding frame. The ability to adjust and tighten the clamping force dynamically ensures reliable battery retention while maintaining a simple overall structure that only becomes complex when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a fixed clamping mechanism is used, then the structure is simplified, but batteries of different sizes cannot be accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamping mechanism structureVSAvoidbattery size accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping device with adjustable clamping force provides the necessary dynamics to accommodate batteries of different sizes. The mechanism can be tightened or loosened as needed, offering versatility without requiring multiple fixed-size structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The clamping force parameter can be adjusted to accommodate different battery sizes and weights. By changing the applied force rather than the structural dimensions, the device achieves adaptability while maintaining a simple fixed structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a heavy-duty clamping device is used to secure heavy batteries, then the battery retention stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheavy battery retentionVSAvoidclamping device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heavy-duty clamping function is segmented into a dedicated clamping device that works in conjunction with the simple holding frame. This separation allows the clamping mechanism to be robust and reliable without making the entire holding device complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The holding bracket serves as an intermediary between the simple holding frame and the clamping device. It transfers the clamping force effectively to the battery while maintaining the simplicity of the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple insertion openings are formed in the side walls, then the adaptability for different battery sizes is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery size accommodationVSAvoidside wall manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple insertion openings are pre-formed in the side walls during manufacturing. This preliminary action allows for easy assembly and adaptation to different battery sizes without requiring complex adjustments or modifications during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a stable and secure holding mechanism that prevents batteries from tipping or slipping, supports batteries of different sizes, and allows for efficient force transfer during clamping, while also being adaptable and cost-effective in material usage.

Implementation Method 1

The tensioning device comprises a transversely threaded bolt which is rotatably fastened or mounted on the holding frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew thread mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

a clamping device for clamping the battery between the holding frame and the holding bracket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical clamping force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3033780B1Battery-retaining device
Publication Date: 2018.01.03 PHOENIX CONTACT GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3033780B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3033780B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3033780B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a battery-retaining device (100) for one or more batteries (101), comprising a retaining frame (103) for inserting the one or more batteries (101), a retaining bracket (105), which can be placed onto an edge of the battery (101), and a clamping device (107) for clamping the one or more batteries (101) between the retaining frame (103) and the retaining bracket (105).