Battery Security Brackets and Fasteners for Telecom Sites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The installation and maintenance of batteries at cell sites are labor-intensive and time-consuming due to their weight and the high risk of theft, while there is a need for efficient recycling and monitoring of batteries to comply with environmental regulations.

Innovation Solution

A battery installation method using security screws and a reinforced bracket to secure batteries, combined with a mobile apparatus for efficient handling and recycling, including de-celling batteries into individual cells for easier handling and tracking through mobile devices and cloud systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If batteries are installed at cell sites for power backup, then network availability is improved, but labor intensity and installation time increase due to battery weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork availabilityVSAvoidinstallation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery system is divided into individual battery units that can be handled separately. Each battery can be installed or removed independently, allowing for more efficient handling and reduced labor intensity compared to moving entire battery racks at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A battery handling apparatus serves as an intermediary tool between workers and heavy batteries. The apparatus includes features like forklift pockets and lifting mechanisms that facilitate easier transfer and installation of batteries, reducing the physical strain and time required for manual handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If batteries are installed at cell sites, then power backup is provided, but theft risk increases due to high battery value and accessibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower backupVSAvoidtheft risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Security screws are installed on battery terminals and mounting brackets before batteries are placed in service. These security features create preliminary barriers that deter theft attempts, making it more difficult for thieves to quickly remove and transport batteries without specialized tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

Security screws use asymmetric drive mechanisms (such as one-way ratchet mechanisms or proprietary head designs) that can be installed with standard tools but require specialized removal tools. This asymmetry creates a barrier to theft while maintaining ease of legitimate installation and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Quantity of substance

If multiple batteries are installed for adequate power backup, then energy capacity is improved, but handling difficulty increases due to severe weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy capacityVSAvoidhandling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The total energy capacity is achieved through multiple separate battery units rather than one large unit. Each battery is designed to be a manageable size and weight, allowing workers to handle them individually with the assistance of the battery handling apparatus, rather than attempting to move a single extremely heavy unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The battery handling apparatus introduces vertical dimension capabilities through lifting mechanisms and adjustable height positions. This allows batteries to be elevated to comfortable working heights and positioned optimally during installation, reducing the physical strain of bending and reaching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If security measures are added to prevent theft, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Security features are applied locally to specific critical points (battery terminals and mounting brackets) rather than requiring comprehensive security systems throughout the entire cell site. This localized approach provides effective theft prevention while minimizing added complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Security screws are relatively simple, low-cost components compared to sophisticated electronic security systems. They provide adequate security for the intended application and can be replaced if needed without requiring complex diagnostic or replacement procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS11101517B2Battery security systems and methods for telecommunication sites
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 ETAK SYSTEMS LLC
  • US11101517B2 patent drawing
  • US11101517B2 patent drawing
  • US11101517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery installation method in a shelter or cabinet includes responsive to placing one or more batteries in the shelter or cabinet, connecting terminals on each of the one or more batteries to associated terminal plates with associated security screws; and connecting a bracket to a housing in the shelter or cabinet with associated security screws, wherein the bracket spans across the one or more batteries and wherein the bracket comprises raised edges which deter cutting.