Battery Sensing Assembly Using Rigid-Flex PCB for Automated Tab Connection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing sensing assemblies for battery modules, which use flexible printed circuit boards (FPCBs) to connect cell tabs, face challenges in automation and high production costs due to manual assembly processes and the need for precise attachment of bent portions, leading to potential errors and excessive use of expensive FPCBs.

Innovation Solution

A sensing assembly utilizing a combination of rigid printed circuit boards (RPCBs) and FPCBs, where electrical bonding is achieved through soldering, electroconductive films, or ultrasonic/laser welding, allowing for automated assembly and reduced FPCB usage, with the RPCB replacing a portion of the FPCB to improve space utilization and manufacturing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If wires are used to connect cell tabs, then the connection is simple, but the wires are very thin and require separate reinforcement to prevent damage due to vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection simplicityVSAvoidwire strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is divided into two functional segments: thin flexible wires for electrical connection and a separate rigid reinforcement structure for mechanical strength. This allows each component to optimize its specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A reinforcement structure acts as an intermediary element between the thin wires and the external environment, absorbing mechanical stresses and protecting the wires from damage while allowing the wires to maintain their thin profile for flexibility and electrical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If reinforcement is added to prevent wire damage, then wire strength is improved, but the thickness increases to at least 3 mm which hinders space utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire strengthVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the reinforcement function from the wire structure, allowing the reinforcement to be positioned separately or integrated only where needed, thus minimizing the volume occupied while maintaining protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement is positioned in a different spatial dimension or configuration that provides protection without increasing the primary dimensional footprint of the wire assembly, optimizing space utilization in the battery module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If FPCB is used to connect cell tabs, then space utilization is improved, but the assembly process becomes complex requiring manual attachment of bent portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The FPCB is pre-formed with bent portions and connection structures before assembly, allowing these complex features to be created during manufacturing when tools and precision are available, rather than attempting to form them during final assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical attachment operations are replaced with automated processes such as precision molding, stamping, or robotic assembly techniques that can handle the FPCB bent portions and connection operations automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual assembly is used for FPCB attachment, then assembly precision can be achieved, but productivity decreases and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment precisionVSAvoidassembly speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual assembly operations are replaced with automated assembly systems including robotic manipulators, automated insertion machines, or precision conveyance systems that can achieve required precision at high speeds through programmable control and repeatable positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The design parameters of the FPCB and connection structures are optimized to enable automated handling, such as standardizing dimensions, adding定位 features, or modifying connection geometries to be compatible with automated assembly equipment while maintaining attachment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Reliability

If more FPCB is used to ensure proper connection, then connection reliability is improved, but production costs increase due to excessive use of expensive FPCB material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidFPCB material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using excessive FPCB material to ensure connection reliability, the design employs precisely sized and positioned FPCB portions that provide adequate electrical and mechanical connection functions, eliminating unnecessary material usage while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The dimensions, trace widths, and layout parameters of the FPCB are optimized to achieve the minimum required connection reliability with minimal material usage, using precision manufacturing capabilities to ensure consistent performance without over-design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables easier, automated assembly of the sensing assembly, reduces production costs by minimizing FPCB usage, and enhances the assembly's robustness against assembly errors, improving the overall manufacturing efficiency and space utilization in battery modules.

Implementation Method 1

a first electrical bonding portion formed between one end of the second substrate and the first substrate to electrically bond the sensing line and the first terminal to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

electrical bonding is achieved through soldering, electroconductive films, or ultrasonic/laser welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSoldering: Soldering

Implementation Method 3

electrical bonding is achieved through soldering, electroconductive films, or ultrasonic/laser welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic welding: Ultrasonic Vibration

Implementation Method 4

electrical bonding is achieved through soldering, electroconductive films, or ultrasonic/laser welding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser welding: Laser Beam Welding

Data Source

PatentUS20250007020A1Sensing Assembly, Manufacturing Method Thereof and Battery Module Comprising the Same
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 SK ON CO LTD
  • US20250007020A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007020A1 patent drawing
  • US20250007020A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a sensing assembly and a battery module including the same, having improved economical efficiency in such a manner that a relatively expensive flexible printed circuit board is used in a smaller amount by allowing a relatively inexpensive rigid printed circuit board to replace a portion of the flexible printed circuit board used for a conventional sensing assembly.