Battery State of Charge Determination Using Weighted Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining the state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) of rechargeable batteries is challenging due to complex degradation mechanisms and the need for robust, cost-sensitive designs that do not interfere with charging or discharging processes, especially in applications with fluctuating load profiles and partial recharge cycles.

Innovation Solution

A method involving two distinct processes to determine the SOC, one through charge counting by integrating input and output currents and another through voltage evolution measurement, with a weighted average calculation to derive a robust SOC value, using loss factors and trustworthiness coefficients to account for measurement reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single charge counting process is used to determine state of charge, then the measurement is simple and cost-effective, but the accuracy and robustness are insufficient due to complex degradation mechanisms and fluctuating load profiles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate of charge determination accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple different processes (charge counting, voltage evolution measurement, and other SOC estimation methods) into a unified framework that calculates a final SOC value as a weighted combination of results from all processes. This merging approach improves measurement accuracy by leveraging the strengths of each individual method while compensating for their weaknesses through the weighted averaging mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal SOC determination method that can accommodate multiple different measurement processes and adapt to various battery types and application scenarios. The framework is designed to be flexible, allowing different processes to be weighted differently based on their reliability under specific conditions, making it applicable to diverse battery systems including those with fluctuating load profiles and partial recharge cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If robust state of charge determination is implemented, then the state of health assessment improves, but the cost and complexity of the control system increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate of health determination reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the battery management system to self-assess its own state of health by utilizing the determined SOC values and comparing them against expected performance characteristics. The system automatically identifies degradation patterns and updates its internal models without requiring external intervention or complex additional hardware, allowing the battery to essentially monitor and assess its own health status through intelligent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from direct complex measurements to using SOC determination as an intermediate parameter that indirectly provides state of health information. By monitoring how SOC values evolve over time and comparing measured discharge capacities against rated capacities, the system can assess battery degradation and health status through parameter analysis rather than direct complex measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple measurement processes are combined to improve accuracy, then the state of charge determination becomes more robust, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate of charge determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputation and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a flexible weighting system where not all measurement processes need to be equally weighted or fully processed at all times. The system can adjust the weighting factors to emphasize more reliable processes under specific conditions while reducing the computational burden from less reliable processes. This partial action approach allows the system to achieve robust SOC determination by focusing computational resources on the most effective measurement methods for given operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10031185B2Method for determining a state of charge and remaining operation life of a battery
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 STRYTEN ENERGY LLC
  • US10031185B2 patent drawing
  • US10031185B2 patent drawing
  • US10031185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Determining a state of charge (SOC) of a rechargeable battery includes using a first process to determine a first value for the SOC of the battery and using a second process to determine a second value for the SOC of the battery and deriving the SOC as a weighted average of the first value for the SOC and the second value for the SOC. During a charging cycle of the battery an input charge of the battery is determined from an input current flowing into the battery and a charging time. During a discharging cycle an output charge of the battery is determined from an output current flowing out of the battery, a discharging time and an actual capacity of the battery is the sum of the input charge over charging cycles minus the sum of the output charge over discharging cycles.