EV Battery Thermal Setpoint Control for Adaptive Charging Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thermal management systems in electrified vehicles use a single fixed profile for all charging modes, leading to inefficient charging due to EVSE power limits, resulting in wasted energy, prolonged charging times, and reduced battery life.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive charging thermal optimization system that dynamically determines temperature setpoints based on charging parameters and EVSE type, using a control system to manage thermal components, optimizing battery conditioning to match available power and extend component life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single fixed thermal management profile is used for all charging modes, then the system is simple to implement, but charging efficiency deteriorates due to EVSE power limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal management profileVSAvoidcharging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The thermal management system transitions from a static fixed profile to a dynamic adaptive profile that automatically adjusts temperature setpoints based on real-time charging mode detection. The control system identifies the charging mode (Level 1, Level 2, or DC fast charging) and selects appropriate thermal management parameters, enabling the system to optimize charging efficiency across different EVSE power limits without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes thermal management parameters (temperature setpoints, heating/cooling rates) based on the detected charging mode. For DC fast charging, more aggressive thermal conditioning is applied to enable higher charge acceptance, while for Level 1 charging, conservative thermal management is used. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing simple implementation through automated mode detection while achieving high charging efficiency through mode-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a single fixed thermal management profile is used for all charging modes, then implementation is straightforward, but charging time increases due to EVSE power limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adapts thermal management behavior to the detected charging mode, automatically optimizing charging time without requiring user intervention. The system monitors charging parameters, identifies the EVSE type, and adjusts thermal conditioning strategies in real-time, maintaining ease of operation while significantly reducing charging time through mode-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from charging mode detection to automatically adjust thermal management parameters. By continuously monitoring charging current and voltage characteristics, the control system identifies the charging mode and applies appropriate thermal profiles, eliminating the need for manual configuration while achieving optimal charging times for each EVSE type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional fixed profile thermal management is used, then the system is simple to control, but energy waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system changes thermal management parameters based on detected charging mode, applying aggressive thermal conditioning only when necessary (DC fast charging) and conservative conditioning for lower power modes. This parameter adaptation reduces energy waste by avoiding unnecessary heating or cooling while maintaining simple automated control through mode detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial thermal management action appropriate to each charging mode rather than always using maximum conditioning. For Level 1 and Level 2 charging, the system uses milder thermal management, reserving aggressive conditioning for DC fast charging scenarios, thereby reducing overall energy waste while maintaining simple automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If mode-specific thermal profiles are implemented, then charging efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidthermal management profile
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic mode detection to automatically select appropriate thermal profiles, achieving high charging efficiency without requiring complex manual configuration. The control system adaptively switches between thermal management strategies based on real-time charging conditions, resolving the contradiction by making the system appear simple to operate while internally implementing mode-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The thermal management system serves itself by automatically detecting charging modes and selecting appropriate profiles without external intervention. This self-service capability achieves high charging efficiency through mode-specific optimization while maintaining simple operation, as the system autonomously manages its own complexity through automated mode recognition and profile selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves charging efficiency by reducing energy waste and extending component life, achieving faster charging times and lower warranty costs.

Implementation Method 1

a set of thermal management components each configured to thermally condition a high voltage battery system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a measured temperature of the high voltage battery system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing: Thermocouple

Data Source

PatentUS20260031647A1Adaptive charging thermal optimization systems and methods for electrified vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 FCA US LLC
  • US20260031647A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031647A1 patent drawing
  • US20260031647A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adaptive charging thermal optimization system for an electrified vehicle includes a set of thermal management components each configured to thermally condition a high voltage battery system of the electrified vehicle and a control system configured to detect whether the electrified vehicle is plugged into electrified vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) and, in response to detecting that the electrified vehicle is plugged into the EVSE, determine a set of charging parameters and limits for the high voltage battery system and the EVSE, determine a type or mode of the EVSE, determine a temperature setpoint for the high voltage battery system based on the charging parameters and limits for the high voltage battery system and the EVSE and the type or mode of the EVSE, and control the set of thermal management components based on the determined temperature setpoint and a measured temperature of the high voltage battery system.