Hierarchical Bayesian Model Maps Cognitive Processes to Functional Severity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods struggle to accurately map cognitive processes to functional abilities, particularly in translating latent cognitive processes into continuous measures of functional severity, which is crucial for understanding changes in cognitive and functional abilities in conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

Innovation Solution

The development of hierarchical Bayesian cognitive processing models that incorporate signal detection theory, allowing for the transformation of latent cognitive processes into continuous-valued measures of functional ability, enabling the mapping of cognitive processes to functional severity and predicting recognition memory performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If discrete functional severity measures are used to classify patients, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of classificationVSAvoidprecision of functional severity measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the discrete functional severity measure into a continuous measure by changing the parameter representation from categorical stages to continuous cognitive process parameters (discriminability d' and response bias c). This allows for more precise measurement while maintaining clinical interpretability through the mapping function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces latent cognitive process parameters as intermediaries between observed cognitive task performance and functional severity classification. These intermediate parameters (discriminability and response bias) provide a continuous representation that bridges the gap between discrete clinical stages and underlying cognitive processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If latent cognitive processes are used to map to functional ability, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of cognitive to functional mappingVSAvoidcomplexity of hierarchical Bayesian model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or procedural assessment systems with a statistical modeling approach. Instead of using complex clinical assessment procedures, the system uses hierarchical Bayesian cognitive processing models that can be implemented computationally, substituting mathematical modeling for complex operational procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters from direct functional severity ratings to underlying cognitive process parameters (discriminability d' and response bias c). This parameter transformation simplifies the mapping process by focusing on fundamental cognitive dimensions that can be estimated from standard cognitive task performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If correlations are computed between cognitive and functional abilities, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of analysis methodVSAvoidinformation loss in correlation analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces latent cognitive process parameters as intermediaries that preserve information about the underlying cognitive mechanisms. Instead of directly correlating observed cognitive scores with functional ratings, the model uses discriminability and response bias as intermediaries that maintain information about the cognitive processes while enabling relationship analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the analysis from simple correlation of observed variables to analysis of relationships between latent cognitive parameters and functional severity. This parameter transformation preserves information about the cognitive processes by modeling them explicitly rather than using aggregate scores that lose process-specific information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9367666B2Mapping cognitive to functional ability
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 EMBIC CORP
  • US9367666B2 patent drawing
  • US9367666B2 patent drawing
  • US9367666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including medium-encoded computer program products, for mapping cognitive to functional ability include receiving data regarding assessments of a cognitive ability and assessments of a functional ability; processing the received data to generate a map of one or more cognitive processes underlying the cognitive ability to a continuous-valued measure of the functional ability; and storing the generated map on a computer-storage medium to be used by a computer device in continuous-valued assessments of the functional ability.