Bayesian Drug Dosing Regimens for Personalized Toxicity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining drug dosing regimens are cumbersome, prone to errors, and limited in scope, often leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes due to reliance on time-constrained measurements and manual rule-of-thumb adjustments, which can result in resistance or toxicity issues.

Innovation Solution

A method using Bayesian models to estimate drug concentration time-courses, incorporating patient-specific data and pharmacokinetic parameters, and comparing these estimates to efficiency and toxicity thresholds to determine an optimal dosing regimen, adaptable to individual patient characteristics and pathogenic agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual rule-of-thumb adjustments are used for dosing, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical calculation methods with an automated computer-based Bayesian dosing system. The system automatically processes patient data, applies pharmacokinetic models, and calculates optimal dosing regimens without requiring manual intervention, thereby eliminating the inaccuracies of rule-of-thumb adjustments while maintaining ease of use through automated computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The dosing system performs self-service by automatically adjusting dosing regimens based on real-time patient data and pharmacokinetic modeling. The system independently calculates optimal doses without requiring manual calculation or intervention, using integrated algorithms that process patient characteristics, drug properties, and measured concentrations to generate personalized dosing recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If time-constrained measurements are used, then loss of time is reduced, but reliability and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss of timeVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic dosing adjustments that adapt to real-time patient responses and pharmacokinetic changes. The system continuously updates dosing recommendations based on measured drug concentrations, patient characteristics, and individual pharmacokinetic parameters, allowing flexible adaptation to changing clinical conditions without requiring fixed time-constrained measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by using measured drug concentrations to continuously refine and adjust dosing regimens. Real-time feedback from pharmacokinetic monitoring enables the system to optimize dosing parameters dynamically, improving reliability through iterative refinement while maintaining time efficiency through automated real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If fixed dosing regimens are applied, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting dosing parameters (dose amount, frequency, duration) based on individual patient characteristics, drug properties, and pharmacokinetic data. The system dynamically modifies these parameters to optimize treatment effectiveness for each patient while maintaining manageable complexity through automated parameter optimization algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by tailoring dosing regimens to individual patient-specific characteristics such as weight, age, renal function, and drug metabolism. Each patient receives a customized dosing strategy optimized for their unique pharmacokinetic profile, enhancing adaptability while the automated nature of the system keeps overall complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If manual dosing interpretation is performed, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual dosing interpretation with automated computer-based calculations that process patient data and pharmacokinetic models to generate dosing recommendations. This substitution of manual mechanical calculation with automated computational systems significantly improves productivity through rapid processing while maintaining or enhancing reliability through systematic algorithmic decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3980944B1Method for determining an optimal drug dosing regimen
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HOPITAUX DE PARIS (APHP)
  • EP3980944B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3980944B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3980944B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The invention concerns a method determining an optimum drug dosing regimen to treat a patient efficiently against drug-sensitive pathogenic agents. From relevant patient-related data and the drug concentration measured at a random time in the patient's body, the method estimates the drug concentration time-course based on a Bayesian model. The residual concentration (Cr) and an efficiency pharmacokinetic parameter (PPE) adapted to said drug and patient are computed from the estimated concentration. A dosing regimen is then determined by comparing the PPE to an efficiency target (CE) for efficiency purposes. The method further may further take into account toxicity constraints by comparing the residual drug concentration (Cr) to at least a toxic concentration (Ctox). A concentration of said drug is determined (E13) based on the result the above comparisons to provide a proposed dose for said optimum dosing regimen.