Bayesian Entity Ranking with Missing Data Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ranking entities based on quantitative characteristics from various data sources faces challenges such as objectiveness, rigor, and repeatability, especially when data for some entities is missing or unavailable.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing Bayesian logic and analysis combines financial, environmental, legal, and other data assets with a weighting system to rank entities within an industry, employing Bayesian inference to calculate scores and handle missing data without assuming normal distribution, and is insensitive to correlations among input data dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional ranking methods are used to assess entities, then the process is simpler, but the objectiveness, rigor, and repeatability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectiveness and repeatability of rankingVSAvoidcomplexity of assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the entity assessment into multiple independent pillars (financial performance, management quality, innovation, legal compliance, environmental impact, social responsibility, reputation, and risk resilience), each evaluated separately with specific quantitative metrics. This segmentation enables systematic and objective assessment while maintaining manageability through modular evaluation units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative entity characteristics into quantitative parameters through standardized metrics (e.g., financial ratios, patent counts, ESG scores, litigation frequencies). This parameter transformation enables rigorous mathematical comparison and ranking while preserving objectiveness through data-driven measurement rather than subjective judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If complete data is required for all entities, then measurement precision is improved, but the system becomes unable to handle missing data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of entity scoringVSAvoidability to handle diverse data availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces Bayesian inference as an intermediary statistical framework that connects available empirical data with uncertain or missing parameters. This mediator enables the system to handle incomplete data by computing posterior probability distributions that incorporate both observed data and prior knowledge, maintaining measurement precision without requiring complete data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the handling of missing data from a binary (present/absent) state to a probabilistic state using Bayesian methods. By representing unknown parameters as probability distributions rather than fixed values, the system maintains adaptability to diverse data availability scenarios while preserving measurement precision through statistical inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If multiple data sources are integrated, then comprehensiveness is improved, but sensitivity to correlations among input data dimensions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of data coverageVSAvoidsensitivity to data correlations
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms correlated input parameters into independent standardized scores through normalization and statistical transformation. By converting multiple correlated data dimensions into standardized, dimensionless scores with comparable scales, the system integrates comprehensive multi-source data while reducing sensitivity to correlations among input variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11195135B2Systems and methods for ranking entities
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 REFINITIV US ORGANIZATION LLC
  • US11195135B2 patent drawing
  • US11195135B2 patent drawing
  • US11195135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems and methods for an entity ranking system. In one embodiment, a computing system is configured to interface with one or more domains to identify a set of entities. The computing system can ascertain a first set of data components for each entity, normalize each of the first set of data components for each entity, and detect a failure to ascertain a second set of data components. The computing system can compute a statistical probability for a possible set of values for each data component of the second set based on the ascertained first set of data components. The computing system can rank each entity based on a derived quantile. The computing system can generate a graphical user interface including a visualization of the ranking of each entity, which can be rendered on a display of the at least one user computing devices.