Bayesian Optimization for Food Experiment Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current food experimentation methods are inefficient, requiring extensive time and resources to achieve objectives such as pH below 6 in yogurt production, as they involve varying multiple variables in sequential trials.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using Bayesian Optimization machine learning to generate experiment trials that optimize parameters like water, sugar, and probiotic levels, focusing search efforts on high-performing areas of the search space based on previous observations, thereby reducing the number of trials needed to achieve experiment objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sequential trials with one variable changed at a time are conducted, then the experimentation process is systematic and controllable, but the time and resources required are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment controlVSAvoidexperiment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the results of each experiment trial to inform and adjust subsequent trials. The system learns from previous outcomes and uses this information to guide the selection of parameters for future experiments, creating a closed-loop optimization process that reduces the number of trials needed while maintaining systematic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by simultaneously varying multiple parameters across different trials rather than changing one parameter at a time. This allows the system to explore the parameter space more efficiently and achieve experimental objectives in fewer trials while still maintaining controllability through structured parameter exploration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple variables are tested in sequential trials, then comprehensive exploration of parameter space is achieved, but the number of trials and resource consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter explorationVSAvoidexperiment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using a machine learning model to predict promising parameter combinations before conducting physical experiments. The system performs computational exploration and generates hypotheses about optimal parameters in advance, allowing the physical experimentation to focus on validating and refining these predictions rather than exhaustively testing all possibilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the experimental objectives and the actual trials. This intermediary learns from experimental data and guides the selection of subsequent trials, acting as a mediator that translates comprehensive parameter exploration requirements into a reduced set of high-value experiments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11514350B1Machine learning driven experimental design for food technology
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 NOTCO DELAWARE AI LLC
  • US11514350B1 patent drawing
  • US11514350B1 patent drawing
  • US11514350B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques to generate experiment trials using artificial intelligence are disclosed. A training set for an experiment generator is continuously built up by using assessed experiment trials. The experiment generator is optimized using one of a plurality of optimization algorithms, depending on which mode experiment generator is to run in for an experiment. The mode is dependent on the experiment mode of the experiment. The experiment generator generates a batch of one or more experiment trials for the experiment. Any of the generated experiment trials may be tried or experimented by a user and may be updated with assessment data as an assessed experiment trial.