Lane-Change Maneuver Prediction Using Bayesian Vehicle Trajectories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems and automated driving systems struggle to accurately predict lane changes by other vehicles, leading to potential collisions and increased accident rates, particularly during lane changes.

Innovation Solution

A method that classifies driving maneuvers of other vehicles by using a time series of their position relative to the ego-vehicle and spatial profiles of lanes, determining conditional probabilities for various driving maneuvers using a Bayesian model, and refining these predictions with the most likely position and probability distribution of the other vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If driver assistance systems use basic position tracking to monitor other vehicles, then the system can detect vehicle positions, but it cannot accurately predict lane changes and sudden maneuvers by other road users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of driving maneuvers by analyzing historical position data and determining the most likely maneuver category before actual lane changes occur. This predictive classification allows the system to anticipate future positions and prepare appropriate responses, improving prediction accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured maneuver categories

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from tracking only current position (2D spatial coordinates) to predicting future positions by adding the time dimension and maneuver classification dimension. By incorporating temporal sequences of position data and classifying maneuvers into distinct categories, the system creates a multi-dimensional prediction model that significantly improves accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the system responds to sudden lane changes by other vehicles, then collision avoidance is possible, but reaction time is insufficient when maneuvers are unexpected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system classifies driving maneuvers in advance by analyzing position time series data and determining the most likely maneuver category before lane changes are executed. This preliminary classification provides early warning of intended maneuvers, giving the ego-vehicle sufficient reaction time to respond safely and avoid collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential lane changes by maintaining awareness of classified maneuver probabilities and potential future positions of other vehicles. This beforehand preparation creates a safety cushion of predicted scenarios, allowing the system to respond more quickly and reliably when actual lane changes occur by already having assessment frameworks ready

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Adaptability or versatility

If driver assistance systems monitor all surrounding vehicles continuously, then comprehensive traffic awareness is achieved, but computational load and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic awarenessVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the continuous monitoring task by classifying driving maneuvers into distinct categories based on position time series analysis. By dividing the complex continuous tracking problem into discrete maneuver classification segments, the system reduces computational energy requirements while maintaining comprehensive traffic awareness through structured categorization of vehicle behaviors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial classification by determining the most likely maneuver category rather than analyzing all possible maneuvers in detail. This partial action approach focuses computational resources on the most probable scenarios, achieving sufficient traffic awareness with reduced energy consumption by not over-analyzing low-probability maneuvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12337865B2Prediction for driving maneuvers of other vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12337865B2 patent drawing
  • US12337865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of classifying a driving maneuver performed by another vehicle in an environment of an ego-vehicle. In the method: a time series of a metrologically determined position of the other vehicle relative to the ego-vehicle that extends to a time step t is provided; spatial profiles of lanes in which the other vehicle may be located are provided; for a plurality of driving maneuvers from a predetermined catalog of possible driving maneuvers, conditional probabilities for the other vehicle to perform this driving maneuver at the time t are respectively determined with a predetermined model by using the time series of the position and the profiles of the lanes; by using these conditional probabilities, a most likely position and/or a probability distribution of positions of the other vehicle at the time step t is determined.