Bayesian Mastery Bar for Adaptive Learning Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for determining mastery in educational or training contexts lack effective methods to assess user progress and mastery levels through interactive content, especially in dynamic and adaptive learning environments.

Innovation Solution

A user interface control system and method that includes a processor for launching a user interface with a content portion and a conversation portion, where the processor receives user inputs, determines mastery levels, and updates a visual mastery bar, utilizing artificial intelligence and Bayesian networks to evaluate user assertions and provide adaptive content delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated Bayesian-network based mastery determination is implemented, then measurement precision of user mastery levels is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemastery level assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Bayesian network as an intermediary computational model that mediates between user interaction data and mastery level determination. This network structure with nodes representing knowledge components and edges representing relationships allows complex assessments to be broken down into manageable probabilistic calculations, improving measurement precision while managing system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters within the Bayesian network based on user responses, updating probability distributions for each knowledge component. By adjusting conditional probabilities and marginal probabilities in response to user interactions, the system achieves precise mastery level determination without requiring complete re-evaluation of the entire assessment model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive content delivery is implemented based on user interactions, then adaptability of learning experience is improved, but loss of information increases due to dynamic updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized learning adaptabilityVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where user interactions are processed through the Bayesian network, which then provides feedback on mastery levels that guide content delivery decisions. This feedback mechanism ensures that adaptive content selection is based on consistent probabilistic assessments, maintaining data coherence while enabling personalized learning paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of mastery probabilities and knowledge component assessments before delivering content decisions. By pre-computing marginal probabilities and conditional dependencies in the Bayesian network, the system prepares adaptive content recommendations in advance, reducing information loss during real-time delivery decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11113616B2Systems and methods for automated bayesian-network based mastery determination
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 PEARSON EDUCATION INC
  • US11113616B2 patent drawing
  • US11113616B2 patent drawing
  • US11113616B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining mastery in a Bayesian network are disclosed herein. The system can include memory including a content library database containing content for delivery to a user. The system can include at least one processor that can receive an assertion from a user device and identify one or several nodes relevant to the received assertion. The at least one processor can further evaluate the assertion and calculate a node mastery probability for the identified one or several relevant nodes. The at least one processor can calculate mastery of related nodes and determine mastery of an objective based on the mastery of the relevant nodes and the related nodes. The at least one processor can generate a mastery bar and update the mastery bar with the determined mastery of the objective.