Bayesian Network Equipment Troubleshooting Using Acoustic and Morphologic Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing equipment malfunctions in large-scale machinery, such as gas turbines, lack accuracy in inferring the cause and timing of repairs, relying on specialized expertise that is difficult to acquire quickly, and fail to provide adequate guidance for large-scale equipment operations.

Innovation Solution

A method using Bayesian networks to infer malfunction causes by selecting and adding acoustic and morphologic data to nodes, excluding operator subjectivity, and establishing a second network for correlating past malfunctions with actual repairs to provide accurate and timely maintenance strategies, including risk cost calculations for repair decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods using operator experience and malfunction databases are used, then equipment can be operated with existing knowledge, but the accuracy of malfunction cause inference is insufficient and specialized expertise is difficult to acquire quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of malfunction cause inferenceVSAvoidtime to acquire specialized expertise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of expert diagnostic knowledge by constructing a Bayesian network that replicates the decision-making process of specialized operators. The network encodes malfunction patterns, acoustic data, and morphologic data into a structured model that automatically infers causes without requiring actual expert operators, thus copying expert capability into an automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human expert operators with an automated Bayesian network inference system. Instead of relying on human operators to analyze acoustic and morphologic data, the system uses probabilistic graphical models to automatically infer malfunction causes, substituting human cognitive processes with computational algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If equipment operation is continued to avoid repair expenses, then productivity is maintained, but the risk of further malfunction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment operation continuityVSAvoidrisk of further malfunction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring equipment acoustic and morphologic data, inferring malfunction causes through the Bayesian network, and using the inference results to determine whether to continue operation or halt for repair. The system feeds back diagnostic information to operational decisions, creating a closed-loop control system that balances productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary diagnostic actions by inferring malfunction causes before actual failures occur. The Bayesian network analyzes current acoustic and morphologic data to predict potential failures, allowing operators to take preventive actions before equipment breakdown, thus maintaining productivity while preventing reliability degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If acoustic data and morphologic data are added to the Bayesian network nodes, then the accuracy of malfunction inference is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of malfunction inferenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic system into distinct modules: acoustic data acquisition, morphologic data acquisition, Bayesian network inference, and decision-making components. Each module handles specific data types or functions independently, reducing overall system complexity while enabling comprehensive multi-parameter analysis for improved diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9696718B2Method for trouble managing of equipment
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • US9696718B2 patent drawing
  • US9696718B2 patent drawing
  • US9696718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for trouble managing in equipment is provided, with which optimal timing of repairing the equipment and occurrence of malfunction probable to occur concurrently with present malfunction or later stage can be inferred with sufficient accuracy, and which can be adopted for large-scale equipment used in a plant. The method for trouble managing of equipment by monitoring operation condition of the equipment with a monitoring means and inferring cause of malfunction of the equipment by an inference means which infers the cause of the malfunction using measured data concerning the operation condition obtained by the monitoring means when malfunctions occur as nodes of the inference means, comprises selecting acoustic data most similar to sound emitted from the equipment in which malfunction has occurred from among a plurality of acoustic data provide beforehand, selecting morphologic data most similar to a pattern of operating condition in the equipment from among a plurality of morphologic data provide beforehand, adding the selected acoustic data and the selected morphologic data to the nodes, and performing inference of cause of the malfunction of the equipment by a first Bayesian network base on the nodes.