Bayesian Network for Autonomous Robot Security Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous robotic systems face significant security vulnerabilities due to their complex and unbounded environments, with existing assessment methods being ad-hoc and computationally intractable, failing to provide a holistic view of system trust that encompasses hardware, software, AI, and supply chain elements.

Innovation Solution

A Bayesian Network-based security assessment tool that scores subsystems using trust metrics, accounting for the integrity of design, supplier trust, and criticality, to determine the internal trust of autonomous systems and evaluate the probability of security breaches, providing a holistic and computationally feasible approach to security evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive security assessment of all subsystems is performed, then security coverage is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security assessment system divides the autonomous robotic system into discrete subsystems (hardware, software, AI, supply chain) and represents each as a separate node in a Bayesian Network. This segmentation allows comprehensive security coverage while managing computational complexity by assessing each subsystem independently and combining results through probabilistic relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The Bayesian Network serves as an intermediary computational framework that mediates between comprehensive security data collection and final trust determination. It processes security metrics from multiple subsystems through defined probabilistic relationships, transforming complex multi-subsystem assessment data into interpretable trust scores and risk probabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If detailed trust metrics are collected from all elements, then assessment accuracy is improved, but data collection burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata collection burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality assessment by collecting detailed trust metrics specifically at critical subsystem levels (hardware integrity, software security, AI reliability, supplier trust) rather than uniformly across all system components. Each subsystem's trust metrics are tailored to its specific security concerns and operational criticality, improving assessment accuracy where needed while reducing unnecessary data collection elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240095354A1Assurance model for an autonomous robotic system
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
  • US20240095354A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095354A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095354A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A security assessment tool and application for an autonomous robotic systems utilizes a Bayesian Network for scoring each subsystem based on security-enabled features. Each subsystem layer may consist of the system, hardware, software, Al, and supplier elements in an autonomous robotic (or other) system. Each element is assessed on the basis of its trustworthiness (based on factors such as the integrity of the design process, the engineering process, followed by the assessment of the integrity of the supplier, and the like) as well as a weighting based on the criticality of that element to the correct operation of the system. Using these factors, a “belief’ in the assurance of the system is determined based on a Bayesian model. The Bayesian Network is used to determine an autonomous robotic systems' internal trust before that can be extended to an external entity.