Bayesian Printer Tuning via Display List Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current printer performance tuning methods are labor-intensive and static, requiring manual adjustment of settings for each print job, which is inefficient and cannot adapt dynamically to varying page contents, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Bayesian analysis-based method that generates a Display List of page objects, selects relevant attributes, analyzes tuning parameters, and adjusts rendering settings in real-time, allowing the printer to learn and save optimal settings for future jobs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning is performed by repeatedly printing, measuring, and adjusting settings, then performance settings can be optimized for specific jobs, but the process becomes very labor intensive and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically analyzing page content, collecting performance data, and adjusting rendering settings without human intervention. The PDL interpreter monitors its own performance metrics and dynamically modifies tuning parameters based on statistical analysis of page characteristics, eliminating the need for manual tuning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where performance data from rendered pages is collected, analyzed, and used to adjust subsequent rendering settings. The system measures actual performance outcomes and uses this feedback to refine tuning parameters dynamically, creating a closed-loop optimization process that automatically improves performance without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning is performed, then settings can be adjusted for specific jobs, but the process is static and applies the same result for all pages of all printing jobs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance tuning accuracyVSAvoiddynamic adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static manual tuning to dynamic automatic tuning by continuously monitoring page content characteristics and adjusting rendering settings in real-time. The tuning parameters are no longer fixed but dynamically modified based on the specific characteristics of each page being processed, allowing the system to adapt to varying content types, complexities, and requirements throughout the printing job.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different rendering settings to different pages based on their specific content characteristics rather than using a uniform set of parameters for all pages. By analyzing individual page properties such as image density, text content, and graphical elements, the system tailors optimization parameters to each page's specific requirements, achieving locally optimized performance throughout the entire printing job.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If default interpreter settings are used, then the system can process all print jobs without manual intervention, but performance is suboptimal for specific job types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic processingVSAvoidprinting performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The PDL interpreter autonomously analyzes page content characteristics and self-adjusts rendering settings without external intervention. The system automatically collects performance data, processes it through statistical analysis, and modifies its own tuning parameters to optimize performance for each specific print job type, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8314973B2Method and apparatus for dynamic printer performance tuning using bayesian analysis
Publication Date: 2012.11.20 KONICA MINOLTA SYSTEMS LABORATORY INC
  • US8314973B2 patent drawing
  • US8314973B2 patent drawing
  • US8314973B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a printing implementing the method for dynamic printer performance tuning. The method includes the steps of processing a page to be printed by a printer description language interpreter to generate a Display List, selecting tuning parameters from the Display List data, analyzing the tuning parameters by a Bayesian analyzer to obtain a score for each tuning parameter, and based on the score of each tuning parameter, adjusting rendering settings of the tuning parameters for printing the page. The steps of training the Bayesian analyzer includes creating a set of training pages, rendering each page to determine best performance settings for each tuning parameter, grouping the pages based on tuning parameter settings, generating Display List data of each page, rendering the training pages in each group to compile training data that are saved for future printing jobs.