Bayesian Project Success Probability Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Project managers face challenges in accurately determining the likelihood of project success due to various subjective and objective constraints, which can lead to disastrous consequences such as revenue loss and strained relationships if uncertainties are not managed effectively.

Innovation Solution

A predictive model is developed using artificial intelligence/machine learning techniques, specifically probabilistic graphical modeling, to estimate project success by analyzing historical project management performance data, including task and member information, and formulating probability distributions for dependency relationships among variables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If project managers rely on subjective judgment to determine project success likelihood, then decision-making is simple and quick, but accuracy and reliability of prediction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of project success predictionVSAvoidcomplexity of predictive system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex prediction problem into multiple independent probability distributions, each representing different project factors (task completion, resource availability, timeline adherence). These segmented probability distributions are then combined through Bayesian inference to produce the overall project success probability, making the complex prediction task manageable and accurate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces Bayesian probabilistic graphical models as an intermediary between historical project data and success prediction. This intermediary framework systematically processes uncertain information from multiple sources, transforming raw historical data into reliable probability estimates while maintaining model interpretability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If historical project data is extensively analyzed to improve prediction accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but computational time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of probability estimationVSAvoidtime for model computation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing historical project data to extract relevant features and pre-computing baseline probability distributions for various project factors. This preparation work is done beforehand, allowing the actual prediction to be made quickly by simply applying Bayesian inference to new project data without re-processing the entire historical dataset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential features and patterns from extensive historical project data that are most relevant to predicting project success. By taking out and focusing on the most critical predictors (such as task completion rates, resource utilization patterns, and timeline variance), the model achieves high accuracy without being burdened by processing all available historical information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8626698B1Method and system for determining probability of project success
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 FMR CORP
  • US8626698B1 patent drawing
  • US8626698B1 patent drawing
  • US8626698B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method is provided for developing a model to estimate a probability of project success. The method includes maintaining a database of historical project management performance data including i) task information associated with at least one completed task and ii) member information associated with at least one team member. The method includes forming a predictive model based on the historical project management performance data. Forming a predictive model further includes formulating probability distributions to characterize one or more dependency relationships in the predictive model. Each probability distribution includes at least one probability determined based on the historical project management performance data.