Bayesian Super-Resolution for Sensor Alignment and Distortion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for deriving high-resolution images from low-resolution images face challenges such as sub-pixel alignment accuracy and instability due to incorrect mathematical formulations, particularly in accommodating distortion and blurring effects.

Innovation Solution

A corrected Bayesian likelihood function is developed, allowing for accurate sub-pixel alignment and stacking of multiple low-resolution images to form a high-resolution image, which includes optimizing point spread function and registration parameters using a marginal likelihood function.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If alignment algorithms such as Lucas-Kanade are used to align low-resolution images, then alignment can be achieved, but sub-pixel alignment accuracy cannot be obtained and the approach cannot accommodate barrel/pincushion distortion, diffraction or other effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidability to accommodate distortion effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the alignment problem from direct image space matching to parameter space optimization. By formulating a Bayesian likelihood function that operates on transformation parameters (translation, rotation, scaling, distortion coefficients) rather than pixel values, the system achieves both sub-pixel alignment accuracy and accommodation of various distortion effects through parameter estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a Bayesian framework as an intermediary between the observed low-resolution images and the desired high-resolution image. This framework uses likelihood functions and prior distributions as mediators to jointly estimate alignment parameters and the super-resolved image, enabling accurate sub-pixel alignment while accommodating distortion effects through the probabilistic model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If optimization algorithms are used to simultaneously align and resolve images by maximizing P(y|A,x), then a model-based approach is achieved, but the process becomes difficult and frequently unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel-based capabilityVSAvoidoptimization stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the joint optimization problem into separate estimation steps. First, alignment parameters are estimated using a Bayesian likelihood function that marginalizes out the image content. Then, the super-resolved image is constructed using the estimated parameters. This segmentation of the optimization process eliminates the instability of simultaneous optimization while maintaining model-based capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the alignment parameter estimation from the joint optimization problem by marginalizing the image variables. This extraction creates a separate, stable optimization problem for parameters only, which can be solved reliably before proceeding to image reconstruction, thereby eliminating the instability of simultaneous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If the Tipping-Bishop Bayesian technique is used to marginalize the super-resolved image and directly optimize alignment parameters, then direct computation of P(y|A) is achieved, but the algorithm frequently diverges when optimizing imaging parameters particularly the point spread function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect optimization capabilityVSAvoidoptimization convergence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reformulates the likelihood function to use a different parameterization of the point spread function and alignment parameters. By changing the mathematical form of the likelihood function and using a hierarchical Bayesian model with appropriate priors, the optimization landscape becomes well-behaved and convergence is achieved, eliminating the divergence problems of the Tipping-Bishop approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8019703B2Bayesian approach for sensor super-resolution
Publication Date: 2011.09.13 TELEDYNE SCIENTIFIC & IMAGING LLC
  • US8019703B2 patent drawing
  • US8019703B2 patent drawing
  • US8019703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Bayesian super-resolution techniques fuse multiple low resolution images (possibly from multiple bands) to infer a higher resolution image. The super-resolution and fusion concepts are portable to a wide variety of sensors and environmental models. The procedure is model-based inference of super-resolved information. In this approach, both the point spread function of the sub-sampling process and the multi-frame registration parameters are optimized simultaneously in order to infer an optimal estimate of the super-resolved imagery. The procedure involves a significant number of improvements, among them, more accurate likelihood estimates and a more accurate, efficient, and stable optimization procedure.