BCC Email Alert System for Unintended Distribution Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current email systems do not provide a means to alert users when they attempt to further distribute blind carbon-copied (BCC) email messages, potentially leading to unintended sharing and breach of trust.

Innovation Solution

A method, system, and program product that detects attempts to distribute BCC email messages and alerts the user via a display mechanism, such as a pop-up window, with options to cancel or approve the action, ensuring awareness of their BCC status before further distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If the BCC function is used to route email messages to hidden recipients, then privacy is provided for the hidden recipients, but the risk of unintended distribution increases because users are not aware they are receiving BCC messages

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprivacyVSAvoidtrust
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to the user by displaying a notification when they attempt to forward or distribute a BCC message. This feedback mechanism informs users of their BCC status and the potential privacy implications, allowing them to make informed decisions about message distribution while maintaining the original BCC privacy function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by preventing the distribution of BCC messages through a confirmation dialog. Before the user can forward or distribute a BCC message, the system intercepts the action and presents a warning, effectively blocking unintended distribution while allowing intentional distribution if the user confirms after understanding the implications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Ease of operation

If no alert mechanism is provided for BCC message distribution, then the system remains simple and easy to operate, but unintended sharing and breach of trust may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoidunintended sharing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting and flagging BCC messages before distribution occurs. When a user attempts to forward a BCC message, the system proactively identifies the BCC status and presents a warning notification, allowing the user to correct their action before any harmful distribution takes place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary alert mechanism that mediates between the user's distribution action and the actual message forwarding. This intermediary layer provides a confirmation dialog that informs users of the BCC status, serving as a protective barrier against unintended sharing while maintaining user control over message distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If an alert mechanism is implemented to warn users about distributing BCC messages, then privacy and trust are maintained, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetrustVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential functionality needed to address the BCC distribution problem - detecting BCC messages and displaying a notification. Rather than implementing a complex comprehensive control system, the invention isolates and addresses only the specific issue of BCC message distribution, minimizing added complexity while maintaining trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of user awareness by introducing a notification flag that appears only when relevant (i.e., when a BCC message is being distributed). This conditional parameter change approach adds complexity only when needed, rather than continuously, thereby maintaining simplicity for the majority of email operations while providing protection when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7457842B2Method, system, and computer program product for alerting an email user prior to the subsequent distribution of a received blind carbon-copied email message
Publication Date: 2008.11.25 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US7457842B2 patent drawing
  • US7457842B2 patent drawing
  • US7457842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Under the present invention, a method, system, and program product for alerting an email user prior to any subsequent distribution of a received blind carbon-copied (BCC) email message is provided. The method includes: determining if the user attempts to further distribute the received BCC email message; and alerting the user that the user is attempting to further distribute the received BCC email message.