Autonomous Beachfront UAV Hazard Detection and Water Rescue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack automated UAVs capable of identifying rip currents and ocean predators and providing timely warnings and rescues, relying on human lifeguards who may react slowly or make mistakes due to limited visibility and distractions.

Innovation Solution

An automated UAV system equipped with AI and sensors to detect hazards, provide warnings, and perform rescues autonomously, using a mechanical rescue system to assist individuals in danger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If lifeguards manually operate UAVs to monitor the shore and identify potential threats, then the UAVs can be used to monitor beach-goers and dangers, but lifeguards who are busy manually operating UAVs may fail to notice dangers or an ongoing emergency at all due to their attention being distracted by the mechanics of operating the UAV

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUAV operation automationVSAvoidhazard detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The UAV system performs self-navigation and self-monitoring using onboard sensors and AI processing. The system autonomously captures images, analyzes them for hazards, and communicates with the lifeguard station without requiring manual control, thereby eliminating the distraction of manual operation while maintaining reliable hazard detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical operation of the UAV is replaced with an automated electronic control system. The UAV uses onboard computers, sensors, and communication systems to autonomously perform monitoring tasks, substituting the mechanical control process with automated electronic processing that does not distract the lifeguard

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If lifeguards manually detect and pilot UAVs to identify threats from the UAV's camera, then threat identification is possible, but human lifeguards are always at risk of reacting too slowly to emergency situations or making human mistakes in identifying dangers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUAV operation simplicityVSAvoidreaction time to emergencies
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual detection and analysis process is replaced with automated image processing systems. The UAV's camera captures images that are automatically analyzed by computer vision algorithms, eliminating human reaction delays and mistakes in identifying hazards while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the beach environment through automated image capture and analysis, providing real-time feedback about hazards to the lifeguard station. This automated feedback loop eliminates the delay between hazard detection and warning issuance, as the system immediately identifies and reports threats without human intervention delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Area of stationary object

If lifeguards use lifeguard towers to monitor the ocean, then a monitoring structure is provided, but the tower only provides a limited view and it can be difficult for lifeguards to identify rip currents, distressed swimmers, or ocean animals as distance and waves hinder their sight of the ocean

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring coverage areaVSAvoidhazard identification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring perspective is changed from ground level (lifeguard tower) to aerial dimension (UAV). The UAV flies above the ocean surface, providing a three-dimensional view that overcomes the line-of-sight limitations of tower-based monitoring. This aerial perspective allows clear identification of rip currents, distressed swimmers, and ocean animals regardless of distance or wave interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical limitation of tower-based viewing is replaced with an automated aerial imaging system. Instead of relying on human vision from a fixed tower position, the system uses UAV cameras and onboard computer processing to automatically detect and identify hazards from aerial images, overcoming the visibility limitations of ground-based monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12482365B2Automated UAV open water beachfront hazard recognition, warning, and rescue system and processes
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 KIM ANGELINA YEJIN
  • US12482365B2 patent drawing
  • US12482365B2 patent drawing
  • US12482365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) open water beachfront hazard recognition, warning, and rescue system and processes are disclosed. The automated UAV open water beachfront hazard recognition, warning, and rescue system includes a UAV that is configured as an autonomous patrol or scout system, an automated rip current and sea animal registration system, and a mechanical rescue system to pull out or support a person in water. The automated UAV open water beachfront hazard recognition, warning, and rescue system is configured to react quickly and reach targets fast because the UAV flies in the air and takes a direct, obstruction-free path to the target.