Beacon-Based Drone Airspace Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods to prevent drones from entering restricted airspace and are vulnerable to hijacking due to lack of navigation interference protection.

Innovation Solution

Implementing beacon devices that transmit access information to drones, determining clearance based on received access parameters, and providing conditional access restrictions such as time-based, toll-based, and access-level restrictions to control drone access to restricted areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no access restriction system is implemented, then drones can freely access airspace, but restricted areas cannot be protected from unauthorized drone entry

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRestricted area protectionVSAvoidAccess control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing beacon devices in restricted areas before drone operations begin. These beacons pre-define boundary profiles and access parameters, so when drones enter the airspace, the restriction is already in place and automatically enforced through signal comparison, eliminating the need for reactive intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Beacon devices serve as intermediary elements between restricted areas and drones. The beacons transmit boundary profile signals that act as a mediator, allowing the system to enforce restrictions without direct physical presence or complex active control systems. The boundary profile signal itself becomes the intermediary mechanism for access control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If drones operate without access verification, then airspace utilization is maximized, but unauthorized access to restricted areas occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAirspace utilizationVSAvoidUnauthorized access
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing drone access parameters against beacon-transmitted boundary profiles. This real-time feedback mechanism allows drones to receive immediate information about their clearance status, enabling them to adjust their flight paths or receive denial notifications, thus preventing unauthorized access while maintaining efficient airspace utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by varying access parameters (such as drone identification, mission type, operator credentials) to determine clearance. The beacon devices compare these parameters against stored boundary profiles and access criteria, dynamically adjusting access decisions based on the specific parameters presented by each drone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If no navigation protection is provided, then drones can navigate freely, but drones become vulnerable to hijacking and signal interference

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDrone navigationVSAvoidAnti-hijacking capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The beacon devices and boundary profile signals serve as intermediary navigation aids that supplement or replace vulnerable GNSS systems. By providing an alternative reference framework for navigation and access verification, the system reduces dependence on external satellite signals that can be jammed or spoofed, thereby enhancing anti-hijacking capability while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive access parameters are required, then access control accuracy is improved, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccess control accuracyVSAvoidParameter verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing access control into distinct components: beacon devices that transmit boundary profiles, drones that provide access parameters, and a comparison mechanism that evaluates clearance. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks independently, improving measurement precision through specialized functions while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9552736B2Systems and methods for restricting drone airspace access
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 QUALCOMM INC
  • US9552736B2 patent drawing
  • US9552736B2 patent drawing
  • US9552736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and devices are disclosed for providing access to a restricted area for a drone by a beacon device. Beacon signals including access information associated with access for the restricted area may be transmitted by the beacon device. The beacon device may receive one or more access parameters for the drone. The beacon device may compare the received one or more access parameters for the drone to the access information for the restricted area. The beacon device may determine clearance for the drone to access the restricted area based on comparing the one or more access parameter for the drone and the access information.