Beacon Mesh Digital Gate for Continuous Position Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing proximity systems are not position-aware and lack security measures to ensure secure network access, as they require client devices to report telemetry data, which can be inaccurate or falsified, and do not compute session data effectively.

Innovation Solution

A network of position-aware compute beacons forms a digital gate that requires client devices to be within the defined area for access, using triangulation and continuous validation to ensure security, without requiring telemetry data from the client devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing beacon technology is used for proximity detection, then client devices can be detected, but the system lacks position awareness and security measures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the security function into multiple independent compute beacons distributed throughout the physical space. Each beacon independently performs position validation and session authentication, eliminating the need for a single complex centralized security system while enhancing overall reliability through distributed validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compute beacons serve multiple functions: they act as proximity detectors, position validation nodes, session authentication servers, and physical boundary markers. This multi-functionality reduces system complexity by consolidating multiple security mechanisms into a single unified beacon infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If client devices report telemetry data for position tracking, then position information can be obtained, but the data can be inaccurate or falsified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoiddata trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on client devices to report their own position data (which can be falsified), the system inverts the approach by having the compute beacons actively measure the client's position through signal triangulation. The beacons detect signal strength from the client and compute position independently, making the measurement process resistant to client-side manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The compute beacons act as intermediaries between the client device and the authentication system. Rather than directly trusting telemetry data from the client, the beacons serve as neutral validators that independently measure position and signal characteristics, providing unbiased position information for authentication decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If existing proximity systems are used, then device detection is possible, but session data is not computed and continuous authentication is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidcontinuous security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous authentication by maintaining active validation sessions between compute beacons and client devices. Instead of one-time proximity detection, the beacons continuously monitor signal characteristics and validate position throughout the entire access duration, ensuring ongoing security without interrupting productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The compute beacons continuously exchange feedback signals with client devices, measuring signal strength and position in real-time. This feedback loop enables dynamic authentication decisions based on current position data, allowing the system to maintain security while enabling continuous access for authorized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If a digital gate with multiple compute beacons is implemented, then secure position validation is achieved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition validation securityVSAvoidbeacon mesh complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple security functions into a single coordinated beacon mesh network. Individual beacons combine their position validation capabilities through peer-to-peer communication, creating a unified secure boundary. This merging approach achieves high security through collective intelligence while avoiding the complexity of centralized control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides secure network access by continuously verifying the client's presence within the digital gate, preventing unauthorized access and tampering, and ensuring the integrity of the network.

Implementation Method 1

triangulating a position of the client device based on the RSSI

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTriangulation:

Data Source

PatentUS12532173B2Secured position aware continuous authentication mesh network
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12532173B2 patent drawing
  • US12532173B2 patent drawing
  • US12532173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are directed to securing network access using a digital gate constructed by position-aware compute beacons that form a beacon mesh. A compute beacon in the beacon mesh, detects a request for access from a client device. In response, the beacon mesh, performs a validation process to validate that the client device is located within a digital gate formed by the beacon mesh. The validation process includes detecting, by at least three compute beacons within the beacon mesh, a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) from the client device; triangulating a position of the client device based on the RSSI; and determining whether the position of the client device is within the digital gate. Based on a result, the compute beacon provides a reply to the client device either comprising a challenge request or a session rejection. Subsequently authentication of the client device results in network access.