Proximity Fence Using Beacon Segmentation for Flexible Geofencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional geofencing technologies are limited in complexity, granularity, and flexibility, as they rely on geographic location information and require reprogramming when changes occur in the environment, such as modifications to store layouts.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of proximity fences, defined by a group of signal sources without geographic location information, which trigger different functions of application programs based on proximity, allowing for more complex and flexible location-based services by using RF transmitters broadcasting beacon signals with identifiers and labels, enabling precise and irregularly shaped boundaries that adapt without reprogramming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional geofencing using GPS coordinates and radius is used, then the system is simple to implement, but the granularity and complexity of location-based services are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeofence implementation complexityVSAvoidlocation-based service complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The geofence is segmented into multiple zones by deploying multiple beacon transmitters at different locations within the geofence area. Each beacon creates a distinct zone that can trigger different application functions, enabling granular control and complex location-based services while maintaining the simplicity of beacon-based implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional GPS coordinate-based geofencing to a multi-dimensional beacon signal-based approach. By using signal strength (RSSI) as an additional dimension alongside beacon identifiers, the system can determine not just whether a device is in the geofence, but also its proximity to specific zones, enabling more complex services

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If a proximity fence is defined by multiple signal sources, then higher granularity and precise irregular boundaries are achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary definition precisionVSAvoidproximity fence structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of calculating complex geometric boundaries for irregular geofence shapes, the system uses multiple beacon transmitters placed at key locations. Each beacon acts as a reference point that copies the geofence boundary information in its signal, allowing the mobile device to determine position relative to the irregular boundary through signal triangulation without complex geometric calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical/geometric approach of defining irregular boundaries with coordinate geometry with a signal-based approach. Mobile devices determine their position relative to irregular boundaries by measuring signal strength from multiple beacons, substituting physical geometric calculations with electromagnetic signal processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If conventional geofence with fixed point location and radius is used, then the system is easy to operate, but flexibility to adapt to environmental changes is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeofence operation simplicityVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The geofence system transitions from a static definition (fixed point and radius) to a dynamic configuration using multiple beacons. When environmental changes occur, such as store layout modifications, administrators can simply relocate or add beacons to reflect the new configuration, and the system automatically adapts without requiring reprogramming of geometric parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of changing geometric parameters (center coordinates and radius) to adapt to environmental changes, the system changes the configuration parameters of beacon transmitters. By adding, removing, or relocating beacons and updating their identifiers, the system adapts to environmental changes while maintaining the simple operation of beacon-based detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2974399B1Proximity fence
Publication Date: 2018.05.23 APPLE INC
  • EP2974399B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2974399B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2974399B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A proximity fence can be a location agnostic fence defined by signal sources having no geographic location information. The proximity fence can correspond to a group of signal sources instead of a point location fixed to latitude and longitude coordinates. A signal source can be a radio frequency (RF) transmitter broadcasting a beacon signal. The beacon signal can include a payload that includes an identifier indicating a category to which the signal source belongs, and one or more labels indicating one or more subcategories to which the signal source belongs. The proximity fence defined by the group of signal sources can trigger different functions of application programs associated with the proximity fence on a mobile device, when the mobile device moves within the proximity fence and enters and exits different parts of the proximity fence corresponding to the different subcategories.