Charged Particle Beam Apparatus Needle Tip Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current charged particle beam apparatuses lack the capability for automatic and continuous sampling due to difficulties in accurately recognizing the tip position of the needle, often resulting in incorrect image recognition, needle deformation, and collisions with the sample piece, which hinders the repeated and precise relocation of sample pieces.

Innovation Solution

A charged particle beam apparatus equipped with a sample stage, a sample piece relocation unit, and a computer system that uses absorption current images for accurate positional control, allowing for the automatic recognition and precise relocation of sample pieces by generating templates for image matching and controlling the needle's movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If absorption current image is used for needle tip recognition, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates when secondary electron yield is close to 1

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneedle tip position recognition precisionVSAvoidimage recognition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a reference object (marker) as an intermediary element with known position and high contrast in absorption current images. This marker serves as a reliable reference point that compensates for the unreliability of direct needle tip recognition when secondary electron yield is close to 1. The marker's position is used to calculate the needle tip position through predetermined positional relationships, thereby ensuring reliable automated sampling even when the needle tip itself cannot be clearly distinguished.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated sampling is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to image recognition requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling automation capabilityVSAvoidimage recognition system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simplified reference model (marker position and predetermined positional relationship) instead of complex needle tip shape recognition. By copying the known geometric relationship between the marker and needle tip, the system achieves automated sampling with reduced computational complexity. The image recognition system only needs to locate the high-contrast marker rather than analyze the complex shape and position of the needle tip directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If needle tip position is determined using absorption current image, then manufacturing precision is improved, but object-generated harmful factors increase due to carbon deposition film interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample piece relocation precisionVSAvoidcarbon deposition film interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the reference function from the needle tip itself and assigns it to a separate marker object. By taking out the position reference function from the needle tip (which is obscured by carbon deposition film), the system can rely on the marker's clear absorption current signal for positioning. This separation allows the carbon deposition film on the needle tip to be ignored, as the marker provides the reliable positional reference needed for precise sample piece relocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate and continuous automatic sampling by ensuring precise recognition and control of the needle's tip position, preventing collisions and enabling repeated sampling without manual intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a charged particle beam irradiation optical system that performs irradiation of a charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

processing with a focused ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam sputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 3

uses an image (also referred to as an absorption current image or an inflow current image) from an ion beam current which flows into the needle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon collection and current measurement: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10658147B2Charged particle beam apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 HITACHI HIGH TECH ANALYSIS CORP
  • US10658147B2 patent drawing
  • US10658147B2 patent drawing
  • US10658147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A charged particle beam apparatus which automatically prepares a sample piece from a sample, includes: a charged particle beam irradiation optical system configured to perform irradiation of a charged particle beam; a sample stage configured to move, the sample being placed on the sample stage; a sample piece relocation unit configured to hold and transport the sample piece which is separated and picked up from the sample; a holder fixing stage which holds a sample piece holder to which the sample piece is relocated; and a computer which performs positional control in relation to a target object based on a template and positional information which is obtained from an image of the target object, the template being generated based on an absorption current image of the target object which is acquired using the irradiation of the charged particle beam.