Stamped Beam Clamp Structure for Inverted Load Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing clamp designs for suspending equipment like conduit, pipe, and ducts from beams often lack flexibility in installation orientation and suffer from reduced load ratings, especially when inverted, leading to deformation and stress on support rods.

Innovation Solution

A beam clamp with a stamped design featuring a first and second hook profile, cross-walls with threaded and unthreaded openings, and a tab mechanism that allows for secure engagement of a threaded rod and set screw, enabling installation in multiple orientations and improved load distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a traditional clamp design is used, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the load rating decreases and deformation increases when inverted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidload rating
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp body is divided into multiple functional walls: first and second side walls forming hook profiles for beam engagement, first and second cross-walls for structural support and rod reception, and a third cross-wall for additional support. This segmentation allows each wall to be optimized for its specific function, enabling the clamp to maintain high load ratings in both orientations while remaining cost-effective to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp employs asymmetric design with the second cross-wall extending integrally from the first side wall and including a tab received into an aperture in the second side wall. This asymmetric structure provides different engagement characteristics for inverted versus non-inverted installations, allowing the clamp to achieve equal load ratings in both orientations, resolving the traditional trade-off between manufacturing simplicity and load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Device complexity

If a traditional clamp design is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different installation orientations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclamp structureVSAvoidinstallation orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The clamp is designed with universal functionality to be installed in multiple orientations (inverted and non-inverted) with equal load rating. The first and second hook profiles engage the beam in both orientations, while the threaded rod can be received through aligned openings in the first and third cross-walls regardless of orientation. This multi-functionality is achieved without significantly increasing device complexity, as all components are integrated into a single stamping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp utilizes three-dimensional spatial arrangement of its walls and openings to achieve orientation independence. The first cross-wall includes threaded openings at specific angles, while the second and third cross-walls provide aligned unthreaded openings. This 3D configuration allows the threaded rod to pass through multiple walls in both inverted and non-inverted positions, enabling installation flexibility without adding complex separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a clamp with multiple cross-walls and tab mechanism is used, then the load distribution is improved and deformation is reduced, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidclamp structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functional elements are merged into a single integrated clamp body formed by one stamping operation. The first and second side walls, first and second cross-walls, third cross-wall, and tab mechanism are all combined in one piece. This merging provides superior structural integrity and load distribution across multiple walls while avoiding the manufacturing complexity of assembling multiple separate components. The integrated design maintains strength without increasing manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240301968A1Beam Clamp
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 ERICO INTERNATIONAL CORP
  • US20240301968A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301968A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301968A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A beam clamp can include side walls configured to receive a beam, and cross-walls that extend between the side walls. A first cross-wall can include a first threaded opening to receive a threaded rod along a first axis and a second threaded opening to receive a set screw. A second cross-wall can include a third opening aligned with the first threaded opening along the first axis.