Lightweight Beam Coupling Apparatus with Box-Section Arm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beam systems for cargo transportation are heavy due to thick metal construction, leading to increased fuel costs and reduced cargo capacity, as they need to be strong enough to support heavy loads.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight beam coupling apparatus with a box-section arm assembly and rotatable head assembly, fabricated from thin sheet metal, which provides increased tensile strength and a slimmer profile, allowing for reduced material usage and weight while maintaining strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thick metal construction is used for beam systems, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam strengthVSAvoidbeam weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The beam coupling apparatus is divided into separate functional components: an arm assembly with first and second parts that can be coupled together, and a head assembly that is rotatably coupled to the arm assembly. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function while using thinner materials overall, reducing weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The head assembly is made rotatably coupled to the arm assembly, introducing dynamic movement capability. This allows the apparatus to adapt its configuration during operation, enabling it to maintain strength where needed while using less material in other areas, thereby reducing overall weight compared to static thick metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by moving object

If beam weight is reduced, then fuel cost decreases, but strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel costVSAvoidbeam strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the apparatus have different thicknesses and material densities optimized for their specific functions. The arm assembly uses thin sheet metal with appropriate thickness variations, while the head assembly has localized reinforcement where it engages the rail. This local quality optimization maintains strength at critical points while minimizing weight overall, reducing fuel costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus utilizes thin sheet metal construction with potentially different material properties in different sections. The combination of thin metal parts coupled together creates a composite structure that achieves the required strength-to-weight ratio, enabling weight reduction for fuel efficiency without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Weight of moving object

If thin sheet metal is used for arm assembly, then weight is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearm assembly weightVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The arm assembly is divided into a first part and a second part that are coupled together. These parts can be manufactured separately using standard sheet metal forming processes, then assembled together. This segmentation simplifies manufacturing of individual components while achieving the weight reduction benefits of thin sheet metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first part and second part of the arm assembly are coupled together to form the complete arm structure. This merging of separate manufactured parts creates the final lightweight component, combining the benefits of simplified individual manufacturing with the weight advantages of thin sheet metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus achieves a significant weight reduction of approximately 1 kg per beam, resulting in lower fuel costs and increased cargo capacity, along with cost savings from reduced material usage, while maintaining or improving strength.

Implementation Method 1

a head assembly, rotatably coupled to the second end of the arm assembly, arranged to engage said rail to inhibit movement of the head portion along the rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3961048B1Apparatus for coupling a beam to a rail
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 LOADLOK MFG
  • EP3961048B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3961048B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP3961048B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus (100) for coupling a beam to a rail along which the apparatus can move. The apparatus (100) comprises an arm assembly (102) having a first end arranged to interface with a said beam and a second end opposite the first end. A head assembly (104) is rotatably coupled to the second end of the arm assembly (102), and arranged to engage said rail to inhibit movement of the head portion (104) along the rail. The arm assembly (102) comprises a first part (202a) and a second part (202b), the first part (202a) and the second part (202b) being coupled together to form a box section.