Charged Particle Beam Focal Position Control via Electrostatic and Magnetic Fields

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Charged particle beam apparatuses, such as scanning electron microscopes, face long processing times due to magnetic hysteresis issues in the objective lens, which affect image quality and throughput, especially with increasing acceleration voltages and complex semiconductor structures.

Innovation Solution

A charged particle beam apparatus that includes an excitation control unit for the electronic lens, an electrostatic field control unit, a focal position height estimation unit, and a control unit to determine necessary adjustments in the excitation of the electronic lens based on sample surface height comparisons, allowing for efficient focal position control using both magnetic and electrostatic fields.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If magnetic field control is used for focal position adjustment, then the control range is wide, but the processing time increases due to magnetic hysteresis removal operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocal position control rangeVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the focal position control into two segments: electrostatic field control for fine adjustments within a narrow range (avoiding hysteresis issues), and magnetic field control for large adjustments when necessary. This segmentation allows the system to optimize between speed and range by selecting the appropriate control method based on the required adjustment magnitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically switches between electrostatic and magnetic field control modes based on the required focal position adjustment. The system determines whether electrostatic control alone is sufficient or if magnetic field assistance is needed, thereby adaptively optimizing the processing time while maintaining the required control range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If acceleration voltage is increased to observe complex semiconductor structures, then the observation capability improves, but the magnetic field requirement increases leading to longer hysteresis removal time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobservation capabilityVSAvoidhysteresis removal time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial magnetic field control by using electrostatic fields for the majority of focal adjustments and resorting to magnetic field control only when the required adjustment exceeds the electrostatic range. This partial use of magnetic control significantly reduces the frequency of hysteresis removal operations while maintaining the ability to handle high acceleration voltage requirements for complex semiconductor observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If electrostatic field control is used exclusively for focal position, then the processing time is reduced, but the control range becomes too narrow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidfocal position control range
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a control unit that acts as an intermediary, intelligently selecting between electrostatic and magnetic field control methods. The control unit evaluates the required focal adjustment and determines whether electrostatic control suffices or if magnetic field assistance is needed, thereby extending the effective control range beyond what electrostatic fields alone can provide while maintaining fast processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces processing time by optimizing focal position control, improving throughput, and minimizing the impact of magnetic hysteresis, thereby enhancing the productivity of semiconductor inspection processes.

Implementation Method 1

an electrostatic field control unit that controls the focal position by changing a control value of an electrostatic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

The objective lens is configured with an excitation coil and a surrounding magnetic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

the magnetic field formed in the objective lens is not always proportional to the control current given to the excitation coil, but has a magnetic hysteresis that depends on the history of the excitation change

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic hysteresis: Magnetic Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentUS11557457B2Charged particle beam apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • US11557457B2 patent drawing
  • US11557457B2 patent drawing
  • US11557457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a charged particle beam apparatus that can reduce the processing time. A charged particle beam apparatus includes: an excitation control unit that controls a focal position by changing a control value of excitation of an electronic lens; an electrostatic field control unit that controls the focal position by changing a control value of an electrostatic field; a focal position height estimation unit that estimates a height of the focal position from the control value of the excitation of the electronic lens; and a control unit that controls the excitation control unit and the electrostatic field control unit. The control unit compares the height of the focal position estimated by the focal position height estimation unit with a height of a sample surface of a sample to be observed, and according to a result of comparison, determines whether it is necessary to change the control value of the excitation of the electronic lens before observing the sample.