Charged Particle Beam Inspection via Dynamic Optical Illumination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current charged particle beam inspection methods face challenges in distinguishing between open and short/leakage defects in semiconductor devices, particularly in the positive imaging mode, where N+/P-well plugs are difficult to differentiate from normal plugs, leading to low sensitivity and the need for multiple inspections.

Innovation Solution

The method involves selectively illuminating an optical beam during charged particle beam scanning to form multiple images of the same area at different optical beam conditions, allowing for enhanced detection sensitivity of various defects without requiring separate inspections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If charged particle beam scanning is performed in positive imaging mode, then short/leakage defects can be detected, but open defects in N+/P-well plugs cannot be distinguished from normal plugs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection sensitivityVSAvoiddefect differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by switching between different imaging modes (positive and negative) during the inspection process. The system dynamically changes the charging conditions of the electron beam to create different voltage contrast images, allowing defects that are invisible in one mode to be detected in another mode. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction by making both open defects and short/leakage defects detectable through sequential imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the imaging parameters by alternating between positive imaging mode (where short/leakage defects are visible) and negative imaging mode (where open defects are visible). By modifying the beam charging conditions and switching imaging modes, the system achieves comprehensive defect detection capability that overcomes the limitation of single-mode inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple separate inspections are performed to detect different defect types, then detection sensitivity is maintained, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection sensitivityVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple inspection functions into a single integrated inspection process. By combining positive and negative imaging modes in one continuous scanning operation, the system simultaneously achieves detection of both open defects and short/leakage defects without requiring separate inspection steps, thereby maintaining sensitivity while improving throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by performing both positive and negative imaging modes in sequential order without interrupting the inspection workflow. The electron beam scanning continues uninterrupted, switching between imaging modes to capture different defect types, thus eliminating idle time and maintaining high productivity while ensuring comprehensive defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the sensitivity in detecting open and short/leakage defects by altering the optical beam conditions during scanning, enabling more accurate identification and reducing the need for multiple inspections, thus increasing throughput while maintaining sensitivity.

Implementation Method 1

scanning an electron beam over surface patterns of devices formed on a substrate, and collecting the secondary electrons emanated from the surface patterns of scanned devices as inspection signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron emission: Electron Impact Desorption

Implementation Method 2

an optical beam is, from one line scan to another, selectively illuminated on the area prior to or simultaneously with scanning of the charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical illumination: Light

Data Source

PatentUS8692214B2Charged particle beam inspection method
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US8692214B2 patent drawing
  • US8692214B2 patent drawing
  • US8692214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging method and apparatus for forming images of substantially the same area on a sample for defect inspection within the area are disclosed. The disclosed method includes line-scanning the charged particle beam over the area to form a plurality of n*Y scan lines by repeatedly forming a group of n scan lines for Y times. During the formation of each group of n scan lines, an optical beam is, from one line scan to another, selectively illuminated on the area prior to or simultaneously with scanning of the charged particle beam. In addition, during the formation of each group of n scan lines, a condition of illumination of the optical beam selectively changes from one line scan to another. The conditions at which individual n scan lines are formed are repeated for the formation of all Y groups of scan lines.