Charged Particle Beam Lithography Write Time Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Charged particle beam lithography is time-consuming and costly due to the high exposure time required to write complex patterns on surfaces like reticles and wafers, especially for advanced semiconductor devices where precision and accuracy are critical.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an artificial background dose in low-density exposure areas reduces the overall write time by modifying the exposure information, allowing for a lower dose to be applied, thereby accelerating the writing process without compromising accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a high dose of charged particle beam is applied to ensure pattern accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but write time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidwrite time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different dose strategies to different regions of the exposure area. Low-density regions receive an artificial background dose to reduce their exposure time, while high-density regions maintain their original dose requirements for pattern accuracy. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing speed optimization in specific areas without compromising overall precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The artificial background dose is applied as a preliminary action before the main exposure process. By pre-exposing low-density areas with a background dose, the patent reduces the additional dose needed during the main exposure, thereby reducing total write time while maintaining the ability to achieve accurate pattern formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the charged particle beam write time is reduced to improve productivity, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite speedVSAvoidpattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively applies dose reduction only to low-density exposure regions where pattern accuracy is less critical, while maintaining full dose in high-density regions where precision is paramount. This resolves the contradiction by allowing productivity improvement in non-critical areas without sacrificing manufacturing precision in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the dose parameter dynamically based on exposure density. By calculating and applying different dose levels to different regions (higher dose for high-density areas, reduced dose for low-density areas), the system achieves both improved productivity and maintained precision through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If an artificial background dose is added to low-density areas, then write time is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrite timeVSAvoidexposure information processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating backscatter, identifying low-density regions, and determining the appropriate artificial background dose without external intervention. This automation minimizes the practical complexity increase, as the additional processing is handled autonomously by the exposure system itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system calculates backscatter effects, analyzes exposure density distribution, and uses this information to determine the optimal artificial background dose. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically optimize exposure parameters, resolving the complexity issue through intelligent self-adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the write time for charged particle beam lithography, enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the process while maintaining the necessary precision for advanced semiconductor manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

charged particle beams shoot energy to a resist-coated surface to expose the resist

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle beam exposure: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

A backscatter is calculated for the area of the pattern based on the exposure information

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackscatter: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS11592802B2Method and system of reducing charged particle beam write time
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 D2S INC
  • US11592802B2 patent drawing
  • US11592802B2 patent drawing
  • US11592802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for exposing a pattern in an area on a surface using a charged particle beam lithography is disclosed and includes inputting an original set of exposure information for the area. A backscatter is calculated for the area of the pattern based on the exposure information. An artificial background dose is determined for the area. The artificial background dose comprises additional exposure information and is combined with the original set of exposure information creating a modified set of exposure information. A system for exposing a pattern in an area on a surface using a charged particle beam lithography is also disclosed.