Charged Particle Beam Probe Current and Divergence Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing charged particle beam inspection techniques for semiconductor manufacturing face challenges in maintaining a balance between focal depth and resolution due to variations in the objective aperture diameter, leading to performance imbalances and reduced defect detection rates.

Innovation Solution

A charged particle beam apparatus is designed with a controller that independently controls the probe current and objective divergence angle, using a system of condenser lenses and a memory device to adjust settings based on the objective aperture diameter, ensuring a stable probe current and optimal focal depth for high-resolution defect inspection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the objective aperture diameter varies, then the objective divergence angle changes, but the balance between focal depth and resolution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresolutionVSAvoidfocal depth stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of the condenser lens (excitation current, focal length) to compensate for variations in objective aperture diameter. By adjusting the condenser lens parameters, the system maintains a stable objective divergence angle and preserves the balance between focal depth and resolution despite aperture variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where the actual objective aperture diameter is measured, and based on this measurement, the condenser lens parameters are automatically adjusted. This closed-loop control ensures that the objective divergence angle remains stable, maintaining consistent focal depth and resolution performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the objective aperture diameter is not controlled, then device complexity is reduced, but performance consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaperture control mechanismVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures the actual objective aperture diameter and uses this information to adjust condenser lens parameters, creating a feedback loop that compensates for aperture variations without requiring complex mechanical aperture control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of controlling the aperture diameter directly, the system changes the parameters of the condenser lens to compensate for aperture variations, achieving performance consistency through parameter adjustment rather than physical aperture control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the probe current is not independently controlled, then device complexity is reduced, but defect detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system independently controls the probe current by adjusting the condenser lens excitation current, allowing precise control of the electron beam parameters to optimize defect detection accuracy without requiring additional complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for precise adjustment of the objective divergence angle and probe current, enabling the detection of fine defects with high accuracy and consistency, even with variations in the objective aperture diameter, thereby ensuring a high defect detection rate.

Implementation Method 1

a first condenser lens that focuses the primary charged particle beam on the sample; a second condenser lens disposed closer to the sample than the first condenser lens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic lens focusing: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

an objective aperture disposed between the first and second condenser lenses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric aperture limitation: Geometry

Implementation Method 3

scanning the sample with the primary electron beam by using a scanning deflector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic deflection: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 4

detecting secondary signals generated from the sample by the irradiation of the primary electron beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary particle generation: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS8405026B2Charged particle beam apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.03.26 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • US8405026B2 patent drawing
  • US8405026B2 patent drawing
  • US8405026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herewith is a charged particle beam apparatus capable of controlling each of the probe current and the objective divergence angle to obtain a desired probe current and a desired objective divergence angle in accordance with the diameter of the subject objective aperture. The apparatus is configured to include an objective aperture between first and second condenser lenses to calculate and set a control value of a first condenser lens in accordance with the diameter of the hole of the objective aperture so as to obtain a desired probe current and calculate a control value of a second condenser lens setting device in accordance with the diameter of the hole of the objective divergence angle and the control value of the second condenser lens setting device, thereby setting the calculated control value for the second condenser lens setting device to control the objective divergence angle.