Beam Failure Recovery Using Unified TCI and CORESET RS Sets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the context of Rel-18 wireless communication systems, the ambiguity arises in determining Beam Failure Detection (BFD)-Reference Signal (RS) sets due to the support of two unified Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) states, leading to unclear configurations when some CORESETs do not apply the unified TCI state, and the number of RSs exceeds the maximum set number, complicating monitoring periodicity and CORESET ID determination.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to resolve ambiguity by determining Beam Failure Detection (BFD)-Reference Signal (RS) sets based on unified TCI states, specific CORESETs, and RS mapped to BFD-RS set IDs, with criteria for ascending and descending orders of monitoring periodicity and CORESET indexes, ensuring clear configuration even when some CORESETs do not follow the unified TCI state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two unified TCI states are supported in Rel-18, then beam management capability is improved, but ambiguity arises in determining BFD-RS sets when some CORESETs do not apply the unified TCI state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam management capabilityVSAvoidambiguity in BFD-RS set determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating between CORESETs that follow unified TCI state and those that do not. Specifically, the patent introduces separate determination rules for BFD-RS sets based on whether the associated CORESET applies unified TCI state or uses traditional TCI state indication. This allows the system to maintain adaptability for multi-beam management while resolving ambiguity by applying different quality rules to different CORESET types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the BFD-RS set determination process into two distinct paths: one for CORESETs with unified TCI state application and another for CORESETs without unified TCI state application. This segmentation is achieved by introducing separate identification rules that check the unified TCI state application status of each CORESET, thereby eliminating the ambiguity that would otherwise exist in the unified determination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of RSs in BFD-RS set exceeds maximum set number, then beam detection coverage is improved, but complexity increases in determining monitoring periodicity and CORESET ID

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam detection coverageVSAvoidcomplexity in monitoring periodicity and CORESET ID determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a clear determination hierarchy for BFD-RS sets before the actual beam failure detection occurs. The patent defines advance rules that first check unified TCI state application status, then use monitoring periodicity as a secondary criterion, and finally use CORESET ID as a tertiary criterion. This preliminary structuring of determination rules simplifies the complexity that would otherwise arise when handling excessive RS quantities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the determination parameters from a single unified criterion to a multi-level parameter system. The first parameter is unified TCI state application status (binary), the second parameter is monitoring periodicity (continuous), and the third parameter is CORESET ID (discrete). This parameter transformation allows the system to handle exceeded maximum RS counts by systematically prioritizing different parameters in a defined sequence, thereby reducing determination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4664782A1Method and apparatus for beam failure recovery in wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP4664782A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2(b)
  • EP4664782A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4664782A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method performed by a terminal in a wireless communication system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure comprises the steps of determining a plurality of Beam Failure Detection (BFD)-Reference Signal (RS) sets and determining a beam failure based on each of the plurality of BFD-RS sets. Each BFD-RS set includes RS indexes based on Control REsource SETs (CORESETs) related to one of a plurality of CORESET pool indexes. The RS indexes are determined based on at least one of i) a unified Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) state related to the CORESETs from among a plurality of unified TCI states, ii) a TCI state related to a specific CORESET from among the CORESETs, and/or iii) an RS mapped to a BFD-RS set ID.