Beam Refinement During Random Access Channel Procedure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In millimeter-wave wireless communication systems, the high path-loss and susceptibility to blockages pose challenges during the random access channel (RACH) procedure, leading to potential beam selection failures due to the use of wider beams with lower gain and non-optimal beam alignment, which affects signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and communication efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of hybrid beamforming techniques, including the transmission of additional measurement reference signals (MRS) or beam refinement reference signals (BRRS) by the base station (NB) to refine the initial beam selection made by the user equipment (UE) during the RACH procedure, allowing for more precise directional beam alignment and enhanced signal energy delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If wider beams are used during RACH procedure, then beam coverage area is improved, but beam gain and signal-to-noise ratio deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam coverage areaVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beamforming process into two stages: initial beam selection using wider beams for coverage, and subsequent beam refinement using narrower beams for higher gain. This segmentation allows the system to first establish coverage area and then optimize signal quality within that coverage region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic beam adjustment where the beam width and direction are modified based on feedback signals received during the RACH procedure. The base station adjusts beam parameters dynamically to transition from wide coverage beams to focused refinement beams, optimizing both coverage and signal quality at different stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If initial beam selection is performed without refinement, then RACH procedure complexity is reduced, but beam alignment precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH procedure complexityVSAvoidbeam alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary beam selection using wider beams and simpler measurement procedures before conducting more complex beam refinement measurements. This preliminary action establishes an initial beam direction quickly, and subsequent refinement measurements are performed only in the narrowed-down directional range, achieving high precision without excessive overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the base station receives signals from the UE and uses this feedback to adjust beam parameters. The feedback loop enables iterative refinement of beam alignment, where each iteration uses the results of the previous iteration to guide the next measurement and adjustment cycle, improving precision while managing complexity through feedback-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If beam refinement signals are transmitted, then beam selection accuracy is improved, but transmission time and procedure duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam selection accuracyVSAvoidRACH procedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial beam refinement by transmitting refinement signals only in specific directional sectors where the UE is likely to be located, rather than performing exhaustive beam measurements across all possible directions. This partial action achieves sufficient beam selection accuracy for the given scenario while significantly reducing the time required compared to complete beam sweeping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic beam refinement where refinement signals are transmitted at specific intervals rather than continuously. The base station transmits refinement signals periodically to allow the UE to measure and report back, enabling beam alignment to be updated at optimal moments without requiring continuous transmission, thus reducing overall procedure duration while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3488657B1Beam selection and refinement during a random access channel (RACH) procedure
Publication Date: 2021.03.03 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3488657B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3488657B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3488657B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to wireless communications and, more particularly, to beam refinement during a RACH procedure. A NB may receive a message via a first beam from a UE as part of a RACH procedure and may transmit at least one signal for beam refinement during the RACH procedure. A UE may transmit, to a NB, a message via a first beam as part of a RACH procedure and may receive, from the NB, at least one signal for beam refinement during the RACH procedure. Any directional signal beam may be used for beam refinement as described herein.