Beam Reporting Biasing for SFN Throughput in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional beam reporting methods in wireless communication systems do not differentiate between single-frequency network (SFN) and non-SFN beam reports, limiting the ability to fully utilize SFN network functions, which are essential for achieving higher throughput and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of enhanced beam reporting methods that apply biasing factors to beam measurements based on beam preference settings, allowing for differentiated measurement and reporting of SFN and non-SFN beams, enabling the network to select the optimal beam for communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional beam reporting methods are used without differentiation between SFN and non-SFN beams, then the system maintains simplicity in measurement and reporting procedures, but the ability to utilize SFN network functions for higher throughput and reliability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to utilize SFN network functionsVSAvoidcomplexity of beam measurement and reporting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing beam preference settings that allow different beam types (SFN and non-SFN) to be treated differently. The network can configure specific beam preferences for different TRPs or beam groups, enabling differentiated measurement and reporting for SFN beams while maintaining conventional reporting for non-SFN beams. This localized differentiation enhances SFN utilization without requiring complete restructuring of the beam reporting framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of beam measurement by introducing biasing factors that are applied differently based on beam type. SFN beams can have different biasing values applied to their measurement results compared to non-SFN beams, allowing the network to optimize beam selection for SFN scenarios. This parameter modification enables the system to leverage SFN capabilities for improved throughput and reliability while maintaining backward compatibility with existing beam reporting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If beam preference settings and biasing factors are applied to differentiate SFN and non-SFN beam reports, then beam reporting accuracy and selection are improved, but the complexity of measurement and reporting procedures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam reporting accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of beam measurement and reporting
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring beam preference settings and biasing factors before beam measurement and reporting occur. The network configures these parameters in advance based on the SFN deployment scenario, so that during actual beam reporting, the UE simply applies the pre-configured biasing factors to SFN beams. This preliminary configuration reduces real-time complexity while maintaining high measurement precision, as the differentiating logic is established beforehand rather than computed dynamically during measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If differentiated measurement and reporting for SFN and non-SFN beams is implemented, then communication performance throughput and reliability are enhanced, but the processing overhead and signaling complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication throughputVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a beam reporting framework that can handle both SFN and non-SFN beams through a unified interface. The same measurement and reporting procedures are used for both beam types, with the differentiation achieved through configurable parameters rather than separate procedural paths. This multi-functional approach allows the system to enhance throughput for SFN scenarios while avoiding the need for separate signaling channels or procedures, thus minimizing additional signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12081304B2Beam reporting enhancements for single-frequency network environments in radio access networks
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12081304B2 patent drawing
  • US12081304B2 patent drawing
  • US12081304B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a method for performing beam measurements in a wireless communication network, including: performing a measurement of a first beam from a first transmission and reception point (TRP) of a network; performing a measurement of a second beam from a plurality of TRPs of the network; applying a biasing factor to one of the measurement of the first beam or the measurement of the second beam based on a beam preference setting; and transmitting, to the network, a measurement report including: indications of the first beam and second beam to which the measurement report pertains; and the measurement of the first beam and the measurement of the second beam after applying the biasing factor.