Variable Beam Shaping for Precise High-Rate Laser Ablation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser machining techniques for three-dimensional microgeometries are inefficient due to long process times, which can be mitigated by increasing removal rates, but this often results in loss of precision and the quasi-melt-free, quasi-burr-free material removal advantages.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus utilizing a variable beam shaping device to adjust the laser beam profile, allowing for different patterns of illuminated and unlit areas on the workpiece surface, enabling high removal rates while maintaining precision through adjustable beam profiles and intensity distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the pulse energy is increased to increase the removal rate, then the productivity is improved, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to loss of quasi-melt-free and quasi-burr-free material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval rateVSAvoidmaterial removal precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The laser beam is divided into multiple sub-beams arranged in a specific pattern, allowing simultaneous processing of multiple locations on the workpiece. This segmentation enables increased total material removal rate while each sub-beam maintains lower energy density to preserve quasi-melt-free material removal characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the beam profile are assigned different intensity characteristics. The beam is shaped to create a pattern where multiple local spots deliver controlled energy for precise material removal, while the overall beam distribution enables higher total productivity through parallel processing zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the pulse frequency is increased to increase the removal rate, then the productivity is improved, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to pulse overlay effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval rateVSAvoidgeometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The single high-frequency pulse stream is segmented into multiple spatially separated sub-beams. This allows the system to utilize high pulse frequency for increased productivity while the spatial separation prevents pulse overlay effects that would compromise geometry precision and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The problem is solved by transitioning from temporal multiplexing (single beam scanning) to spatial multiplexing (multiple simultaneous beams). The beam shaping device creates a two-dimensional array of sub-beams, adding a spatial dimension to the processing approach that enables high frequency operation without pulse interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the feed rate is increased to maintain constant pulse overlay at higher repetition rates, then the productivity is improved, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to reduced processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval rateVSAvoidmachining precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The processing task is segmented across multiple simultaneous beam locations rather than sequential scanning. This parallel processing approach eliminates the need to increase feed rate, as material removal occurs at multiple points concurrently, maintaining both high productivity and sufficient dwell time for precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sub-beams operate simultaneously and continuously across different locations, eliminating the intermittent nature of sequential scanning. This continuous parallel action maintains high productivity while ensuring each location receives adequate processing time for precision material removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables faster and more precise three-dimensional machining with reduced melting and burr formation, allowing for increased pulse energy use without losing quasi-melt-free and quasi-burr-free advantages, by controlling the beam profile and intensity distribution dynamically.

Implementation Method 1

For a material removal, in particular, lasers with ultrashortes of laser pulses (UKP) are used... Such ultra-ferrous pulse laser allows, in particular, a quasi-melt-free and grass-free removal of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

The laser beam is influenced in the proposed method by means of at least a variable beam shaping device and then applies to at least one processing surface of the workpiece. By means of the beam shaping device, at least one predetermined adjustable beam profile is impressed to the laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam shaping:

Data Source

PatentEP2844416B1Method and device for laser machining
Publication Date: 2021.03.17 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2844416B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2844416B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2844416B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for machining a workpiece (110) using laser radiation, in particular for the purpose of laser ablation. At least one laser beam (130) is provided which is influenced by means of at least one variable beam-shaping device (132). The laser beam (130) then impinges on at least one machining surface (112) of the workpiece (110). At least one specified adjustable beam profile (116, 118, 120) is applied to the laser beam (130) at the location of the machining surface (112) by means of the beam-shaping device (132).