Beam-Switching Antenna Switching Matrix Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beam switching antennas with a large number of antenna elements become complex and inefficient when trying to supply multiple adjacent elements with different signals, particularly in generating symmetrical beams with eight adjacent antenna elements constructed from four signals of different amplitudes.

Innovation Solution

The beam switching antenna employs two switching matrices with Log2(N) stages, each stage comprising N/2 matrix switches with two inputs and two outputs, arranged in a specific interconnection pattern to distribute signals efficiently to 2N adjacent antenna elements, allowing for symmetrical beam generation with reduced complexity and loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional switching matrices are used to supply multiple adjacent antenna elements with different signals, then the number of signal combinations increases, but the device complexity and insertion losses increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of signal combinationsVSAvoidswitching matrix complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the switching matrix into multiple stages, where each stage handles a subset of the signal routing. This segmentation allows the system to achieve the same adaptability with simpler, more manageable switching units at each stage, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining the capability to supply multiple adjacent antenna elements with different signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a spatial dimension to the switching architecture by arranging switching units in a specific geometric pattern (e.g., hexagonal or triangular lattice). This spatial arrangement enables signal distribution to multiple adjacent antenna elements through geometric relationships rather than through complex sequential switching, reducing the number of required signal combinations while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional switching matrices are used to supply multiple adjacent antenna elements with different signals, then signal distribution capability is maintained, but insertion losses and amplitude/phase dispersions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal distribution capabilityVSAvoidinsertion losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-arranges the switching units in a specific geometric configuration that anticipates the signal distribution requirements. This preliminary structural arrangement allows signals to reach multiple adjacent antenna elements through direct geometric pathways, minimizing the number of switching operations required and thereby reducing cumulative insertion losses and amplitude/phase dispersions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By introducing a spatial dimension to the switching architecture, the patent creates direct geometric pathways for signal distribution. This allows signals to reach multiple antenna elements through shorter, more direct routes compared to conventional sequential switching, reducing the number of switching stages and minimizing energy losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If the number of antenna elements is increased to improve beam coverage, then the area covered is increased, but the switching matrix complexity increases rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam coverage areaVSAvoidswitching matrix complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large antenna array into multiple smaller groups, each served by a dedicated switching unit in the geometric lattice. This allows the system to support a large total number of antenna elements without requiring a single complex switching matrix, as each segment can be controlled independently with simpler switching logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent arranges switching units and antenna elements in a two-dimensional geometric lattice structure. This spatial arrangement allows the system to scale to large numbers of antenna elements by adding more lattice points rather than increasing the complexity of a single switching matrix, enabling large beam coverage areas with manageable local switching complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2456008B1Beam-switching antenna
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 THALES SA
  • EP2456008B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2456008B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2456008B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The antenna (10) has antennal elements (14) placed around a cylindrical surface along increasing numbers. Distribution switches (52) at input and outputs of distribution block (20) are connected to a switching matrix (50) at the input and the elements of unpaired order at the output, and are connected to another switching matrix (48) at the input and the elements of paired order at the output. The elements, whose number remains in Euclidean division by 2N, are connected to the numbered distribution switches. Each switch is connected to output of the matrices of same number.