Digital Beam Forming Cross-Polarization Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radio frequency communication systems face interference due to cross-polarized components, which are not adequately addressed by traditional digital beam forming techniques that prioritize co-polarized components, leading to compromised system performance.

Innovation Solution

An advanced digital beam forming technique that utilizes the relationship between co-polarized and cross-polarized components to increase co-polarized energy while suppressing cross-polarized components by applying electronic weightings and adaptive optimization loops, leveraging orthogonal polarized signal components to double the system's degrees of freedom.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If digital beam forming techniques are used to maximize co-pol in-phase alignments, then co-pol signal strength is increased, but cross-pol interference is not adequately suppressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveco-pol signal strengthVSAvoidcross-pol interference
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam forming process into two independent optimization loops: one for co-pol components and another for cross-pol components. This allows separate optimization of each polarization type without interference, enabling simultaneous maximization of co-pol signal strength and minimization of cross-pol interference through independent weight adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the traditional single-loop beam forming into a dual-loop optimization structure, adding another dimension to the optimization process. By creating separate optimization paths for co-pol and cross-pol components, the system can independently control each polarization type, effectively resolving the contradiction between signal strength and interference suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If additional constraint conditions are added to suppress cross-pol, then cross-pol mitigation performance is improved, but co-pol performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-pol mitigationVSAvoidco-pol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the optimization into separate segments for co-pol and cross-pol, allowing cross-pol mitigation to be achieved through a dedicated optimization loop that does not interfere with co-pol performance. Each loop optimizes its specific polarization type independently, preventing the degradation that would result from combined optimization constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If both co-pol and cross-pol are optimized simultaneously, then both components are considered, but degrees of freedom are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedual polarization optimizationVSAvoiddegrees of freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization problem into two independent sub-problems, one for co-pol and one for cross-pol. This segmentation increases the effective degrees of freedom by allowing each polarization type to be optimized independently with its own set of weight coefficients, rather than constraining both simultaneously within a single limited optimization framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9628250B2Advanced beam-forming technology with cross-polarization cancellation schemes
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 CHANG DONALD C D
  • US9628250B2 patent drawing
  • US9628250B2 patent drawing
  • US9628250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An advanced digital beam forming technique is achieved that is capable of simultaneously forming multiple beams and attenuating the cross-pol component at multiple locations. The proposed invention, comprising a series of signal inputs, optimization loops and weighting processes, successfully eliminates the side effect of an increase of the cross-pol in the process of beam-forming, thus reducing potential interference. This technique utilizes the orthogonally polarized signal component which is already available and can minimize both the horizontally polarized and vertically polarized cross-pol at the same time. The complexity of computation can be reduced by using only part of the orthogonal polarized components in the optimization.