Beamforming Failure Detection Using Signal Strength Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beamforming systems require manual detection and correction of failures, leading to prolonged signal degradation and reduced quality of service for users.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic system and method for detecting and correcting beamforming deactivation by monitoring average signal strength and triggering corrective measures, such as resetting antenna line devices or recalibrating antennas, to reactivate beamforming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual detection and correction of beamforming failures is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and response time deteriorate due to prolonged signal degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidfailure response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the beamforming system to automatically detect its own failures through monitoring signal strength metrics and triggering corrective actions without human intervention. The system monitors itself and performs self-diagnosis when signal degradation is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring signal strength metrics from user devices and using this information to detect beamforming failures. The monitoring feedback loop triggers automatic corrective actions when degradation thresholds are exceeded, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual correction of beamforming failures is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to prolonged signal degradation affecting users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidquality of service
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively monitoring signal strength metrics and detecting beamforming failures before they significantly impact user experience. Corrective actions are triggered automatically upon detection, preventing prolonged service degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the beamforming system to automatically detect its own failures through monitoring signal strength metrics and triggering corrective actions without human intervention. The system monitors itself and performs self-diagnosis when signal degradation is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automatic detection and correction systems are implemented, then productivity and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure response timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by combining monitoring, detection, diagnosis, and correction functions into a single integrated system. The same infrastructure used for normal beamforming operation is leveraged for failure detection and correction, reducing the need for separate dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring signal strength metrics from user devices and using this information to detect beamforming failures. The monitoring feedback loop triggers automatic corrective actions when degradation thresholds are exceeded, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If manual failure detection is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time increases due to delayed restoration of signal strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidtime to restore service
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively monitoring signal strength metrics and detecting beamforming failures before they significantly impact user experience. Corrective actions are triggered automatically upon detection, preventing prolonged service degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical operations with automated electronic monitoring and control. Signal strength metrics are automatically measured, compared against thresholds, and corrective actions are automatically triggered, eliminating the need for manual intervention while reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12506523B2Dynamically detecting and correcting the deactivation of beamforming
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US12506523B2 patent drawing
  • US12506523B2 patent drawing
  • US12506523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for dynamically detecting and correcting the deactivation of beamforming from an antenna. One or more users are identified as present within a particular geographic area typically served by beamforming, and the average signal strength of the one or more user devices is monitored. If a threshold level of degradation of the average signal strength is detected, then a beamforming status is determined for one or more of the antennas serving the user device or devices. Based on the determination, corrective measures are taken and beamforming is reactivated.