Segmented Bearing Cage with Axial Recesses for Injection Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-diameter bearings with segmented cages face challenges in uniform material injection and cooling shrinkage during manufacturing, leading to mechanical property degradation, deformation, and breakage due to non-uniform geometries and trapped air bubbles in synthetic material molding processes.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a cage segment with varying thickness radial beams, axial recesses, and circumferential beams to improve injection molding feasibility and reduce material volume, featuring recesses that enhance material flow and reduce cooling time, while maintaining mechanical integrity through optimized geometry and material distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If segments are made from synthetic material using injection molding, then weight is reduced and ease of manufacture is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to non-uniform cooling shrinkage and trapped air bubbles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of cage segmentVSAvoiduniformity of segment geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the thickness of different portions of the cage segment. Specifically, the radial beams have different thicknesses at different locations, and the end portions have varying thicknesses. This non-uniform thickness distribution compensates for the non-uniform cooling shrinkage that occurs during injection molding, allowing the segment to maintain dimensional accuracy and geometric uniformity despite the inherent shrinkage variations. The thinner portions shrink less while thicker portions shrink more, balancing out the overall dimensional stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If segments have large dimensions and complex geometry with varying thicknesses, then functionality is improved, but injection molding becomes difficult and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometrical functionality of segmentVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating axial recesses in the radial beams and end portions before the injection molding process. These pre-designed recesses serve as pathways that guide the flow of molten synthetic material during injection, ensuring uniform filling of the mold cavity. By preparing these flow channels in advance, the complex geometry with varying thicknesses can be successfully manufactured without trapping air bubbles, thereby maintaining both functionality and manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If metallic segments are used, then strength and reliability are improved, but weight increases and ease of manufacture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of segmentVSAvoidweight of cage segment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the thickness parameters of the synthetic material segments. Instead of using uniform thickness, the design incorporates varying thicknesses in different portions - thinner where strength is less critical and thicker where structural support is needed. This parameter optimization allows synthetic material to achieve the required mechanical strength while maintaining weight advantages over metallic segments. The optimized geometry compensates for the inherently lower strength of synthetic material through strategic thickness distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces cooling time, minimizes deformation, and increases manufacturing reliability, resulting in a lighter, more rigid, and cost-effective segmented cage with improved mechanical properties and reduced material usage.

Implementation Method 1

the shrinkage occurring during the cooling of the injected material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 2

the shrinkage occurring during the cooling of the injected material is not uniform and lead to deformation of the segment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS10400823B2Cage segment, segmented cage, and bearing
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US10400823B2 patent drawing
  • US10400823B2 patent drawing
  • US10400823B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cage segment for a bearing rotatable around an axis being able to receive a plurality of rolling elements configured to travel on two annular raceways respectively on inner and outer rings of the bearing, and including an inner wall that extends circumferentially in the form of a cylinder, the axis of symmetry being the axis (X1), an outer wall that extends circumferentially in the form of a cylinder, the axis of symmetry being the axis (X1), two end portions that are circumferentially opposed, which extend radially with respect to the axis (X1) and which connect together the inner wall and the outer wall, a plurality of successive pockets for receiving the rolling elements, so that two successive pockets are circumferentially delimitated by a radial beam, The radial beam extending radially with respect to the axis (X1), the radial beam comprising two end portions so that one end portion connects with the inner wall and the other end portion connects with the outer wall, The radial beam provides a first recess that extends axially with respect to the axis (X1).