Wheel End Bearing Failure Detection Using Thermal Model Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for diagnosing wheel end bearing failures in vehicles are unreliable, as they often rely on inaccurate mathematical models for estimating brake temperatures, which may not detect bearing failures accurately, especially when the brake mechanism behaves differently than expected.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that use a temperature sensor and processing circuitry to calculate an estimated bearing temperature and compare it with a measured temperature, determining a failure when the difference exceeds a predefined threshold, facilitating early detection of bearing-related issues by placing the temperature sensor strategically and using mathematical models that account for heat transfer from brake hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If mathematical models are used to estimate bearing temperature, then the diagnosis system can operate without additional sensors, but the measurement accuracy deteriorates due to model uncertainties and assumptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidtemperature measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by comparing the measured temperature from the sensor with the estimated temperature from the mathematical model. When the difference between measured and estimated values exceeds a threshold, the system triggers a failure determination. This feedback mechanism allows the system to leverage both the simplicity of model-based estimation and the accuracy of sensor measurement, resolving the contradiction between device complexity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a temperature sensor is installed to measure bearing temperature directly, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the temperature sensor measurement function with the existing mathematical model-based temperature estimation system. Rather than using the sensor in isolation, it combines the sensor data with the model predictions through comparison logic. This merging approach allows the system to achieve high measurement precision while avoiding the complexity of completely replacing the model-based system with a dedicated sensor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature sensor serves multiple functions: it provides direct temperature measurement for accuracy, enables comparison with model predictions for failure detection, and can validate the mathematical model's assumptions. This multi-functionality allows a single sensor to achieve high measurement precision while justifying its inclusion in the system without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If mathematical models assume normal brake operation, then the estimation process simplifies, but reliability deteriorates when brake mechanism fails or behaves differently than expected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoiddiagnosis reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The comparison between measured and estimated temperatures acts as a feedback mechanism that detects when the mathematical model's assumptions no longer hold. When the brake mechanism behaves differently than expected, the temperature deviation triggers a failure determination, allowing the system to maintain reliability even when model assumptions are violated. This feedback loop resolves the contradiction by providing a safety net that catches model failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a more reliable means of detecting wheel end bearing failures, reducing the risk of incorrect determinations and enabling timely corrective action to prevent hazardous situations, such as bearing failure or spindle/knuckle damage.

Implementation Method 1

acquiring, using a temperature sensor, a measured value of the temperature of the wheel end bearing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 2

using mathematical models that account for heat transfer from brake hardware

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP4117935B1A method and a system for determining that a failure has occurred at or in a wheel end bearing of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • EP4117935B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4117935B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4117935B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of determining that a failure has occurred at or in a wheel end bearing of a vehicle. An estimated value of the temperature of the wheel end bearing is calculated by a processing circuitry. A measured value of the temperature of the wheel end bearing is acquired by a temperature sensor. The measured value is compared with the estimated value by the processing circuitry. When the measured value deviates from the estimated value by a predefined difference or more, then the processing circuitry determines that a failure has occurred. The invention also relates to a system for determining that a failure has occurred.